Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning

Hye-Eun Chu, Chee Leong Wong

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The aim of this research was to investigate Singaporean pre-service science teachers’ knowledge of assessment and how they implemented assessment for learning (AforL), or formative assessment, during their practicum teaching. Sixty pre-service science/physics teachers in the post-graduate diploma in education (PGDE) programme participated in this research. The pre-service teachers’ responses to an open-ended questionnaire were collected and analysed to investigate their prior understanding related to formative assessment. Individual reflection pieces written during practicum teaching were analysed to identify the pre-service teachers’ beliefs about formative assessment and their implementation of formative assessment strategies during their teaching practices. The findings indicate that the pre-service teachers believed that the implementation of formative assessment based on constructivist and inquiry-based teaching principles was more effective than other approaches. However, their responses were more negative regarding the implementation of strategies related to formative assessment when the teaching approach included classroom discourse with inquiry. This tendency was possibly due do their inexperience of facilitating students’ discourse using formative assessment strategies. They also reported that discourse approaches, using AforL, are time consuming and/or impractical. Depending on their beliefs about and perceptions of the objectives for students’ learning, the pre-service science teachers reflected differently on their practicum practices.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationStudies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region
EditorsMay May Hung Cheng, Alister Jones, Cathy Buntting
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter13
Pages180-193
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781317510703, 9781315717678
ISBN (Print)9781138858848
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameRoutledge research in education

Fingerprint

teacher
science
learning
student
Teaching
discourse
teaching practice
physics
graduate
classroom
questionnaire
education

Cite this

Chu, H-E., & Wong, C. L. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning. In M. M. H. Cheng, A. Jones, & C. Buntting (Eds.), Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 180-193). (Routledge research in education). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Chu, Hye-Eun ; Wong, Chee Leong. / Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning. Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region. editor / May May Hung Cheng ; Alister Jones ; Cathy Buntting. London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2018. pp. 180-193 (Routledge research in education).
@inbook{4366fe08fd7e4917ad3ba0056dfa9b46,
title = "Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning",
abstract = "The aim of this research was to investigate Singaporean pre-service science teachers’ knowledge of assessment and how they implemented assessment for learning (AforL), or formative assessment, during their practicum teaching. Sixty pre-service science/physics teachers in the post-graduate diploma in education (PGDE) programme participated in this research. The pre-service teachers’ responses to an open-ended questionnaire were collected and analysed to investigate their prior understanding related to formative assessment. Individual reflection pieces written during practicum teaching were analysed to identify the pre-service teachers’ beliefs about formative assessment and their implementation of formative assessment strategies during their teaching practices. The findings indicate that the pre-service teachers believed that the implementation of formative assessment based on constructivist and inquiry-based teaching principles was more effective than other approaches. However, their responses were more negative regarding the implementation of strategies related to formative assessment when the teaching approach included classroom discourse with inquiry. This tendency was possibly due do their inexperience of facilitating students’ discourse using formative assessment strategies. They also reported that discourse approaches, using AforL, are time consuming and/or impractical. Depending on their beliefs about and perceptions of the objectives for students’ learning, the pre-service science teachers reflected differently on their practicum practices.",
author = "Hye-Eun Chu and Wong, {Chee Leong}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138858848",
series = "Routledge research in education",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
pages = "180--193",
editor = "Cheng, {May May Hung } and Alister Jones and Cathy Buntting",
booktitle = "Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Chu, H-E & Wong, CL 2018, Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning. in MMH Cheng, A Jones & C Buntting (eds), Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region. Routledge research in education, Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp. 180-193.

Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning. / Chu, Hye-Eun; Wong, Chee Leong.

Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region. ed. / May May Hung Cheng; Alister Jones; Cathy Buntting. London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2018. p. 180-193 (Routledge research in education).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning

AU - Chu, Hye-Eun

AU - Wong, Chee Leong

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The aim of this research was to investigate Singaporean pre-service science teachers’ knowledge of assessment and how they implemented assessment for learning (AforL), or formative assessment, during their practicum teaching. Sixty pre-service science/physics teachers in the post-graduate diploma in education (PGDE) programme participated in this research. The pre-service teachers’ responses to an open-ended questionnaire were collected and analysed to investigate their prior understanding related to formative assessment. Individual reflection pieces written during practicum teaching were analysed to identify the pre-service teachers’ beliefs about formative assessment and their implementation of formative assessment strategies during their teaching practices. The findings indicate that the pre-service teachers believed that the implementation of formative assessment based on constructivist and inquiry-based teaching principles was more effective than other approaches. However, their responses were more negative regarding the implementation of strategies related to formative assessment when the teaching approach included classroom discourse with inquiry. This tendency was possibly due do their inexperience of facilitating students’ discourse using formative assessment strategies. They also reported that discourse approaches, using AforL, are time consuming and/or impractical. Depending on their beliefs about and perceptions of the objectives for students’ learning, the pre-service science teachers reflected differently on their practicum practices.

AB - The aim of this research was to investigate Singaporean pre-service science teachers’ knowledge of assessment and how they implemented assessment for learning (AforL), or formative assessment, during their practicum teaching. Sixty pre-service science/physics teachers in the post-graduate diploma in education (PGDE) programme participated in this research. The pre-service teachers’ responses to an open-ended questionnaire were collected and analysed to investigate their prior understanding related to formative assessment. Individual reflection pieces written during practicum teaching were analysed to identify the pre-service teachers’ beliefs about formative assessment and their implementation of formative assessment strategies during their teaching practices. The findings indicate that the pre-service teachers believed that the implementation of formative assessment based on constructivist and inquiry-based teaching principles was more effective than other approaches. However, their responses were more negative regarding the implementation of strategies related to formative assessment when the teaching approach included classroom discourse with inquiry. This tendency was possibly due do their inexperience of facilitating students’ discourse using formative assessment strategies. They also reported that discourse approaches, using AforL, are time consuming and/or impractical. Depending on their beliefs about and perceptions of the objectives for students’ learning, the pre-service science teachers reflected differently on their practicum practices.

UR - https://www.routledge.com/Studies-in-Science-Education-in-the-Asia-Pacific-Region/Cheng-Jones-Buntting/p/book/9781138858848

UR - https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317510703

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049930911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138858848

T3 - Routledge research in education

SP - 180

EP - 193

BT - Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region

A2 - Cheng, May May Hung

A2 - Jones, Alister

A2 - Buntting, Cathy

PB - Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group

CY - London

ER -

Chu H-E, Wong CL. Pre-service science teachers’ implementation of assessment for students’ learning. In Cheng MMH, Jones A, Buntting C, editors, Studies in science education in the Asia-Pacific region. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 2018. p. 180-193. (Routledge research in education).