Precision analysis of kinetic modelling estimates in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI

Dieter De Naeyer*, Yves De Deene, Wim P. Ceelen, Patrick Segers, Pascal Verdonck

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)


Object: Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and pharmacokinetic modelling provide a powerful tool for tumour diagnosis and treatment evaluation. However, several studies show low reproducibility of the technique and poor precision of the transendothelial transfer constant K trans. This work proposes a theoretical framework describing how finite signal-noise-ratio (SNR) in the MR images is propagated throughout the measurement protocol to uncertainty on the kinetic parameter estimates. Materials and methods: After deriving a distribution for the contrast agent concentration, a maximum likelihood estimator (MLM) is proposed that exhibits Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB). An analytical expression is derived for the CRLB that can be used to determine confidence intervals for kinetic parameters and to investigate the influence of protocol parameters as scan time and temporal resolution on K trans-precision. Results: K trans-uncertainty can be reduced up to 30% by using MLM in comparison with least square estimator. K trans-precision is proportional to the SNR and depends strongly on the kinetic parameter values themselves. Minimal scan time and temporal resolution were found to be 15 min and 15 s, respectively, for Gd-DTPA. Temporal resolution should be enhanced by decreasing the NEX parameter (NEX ≤ 1). Conclusion: CRLB provide a golden standard to construct 95% confidence intervals, which can be used to perform protocol optimization and to test the statistical significance of K trans-changes in treatment evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-66
Number of pages16
JournalMagnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Precision analysis of kinetic modelling estimates in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this