Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths

Ossi Nokelainen*, Sanni A. Silvasti, Sharon Y. Strauss, Niklas Wahlberg, Johanna Mappes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Natural selection generally favours phenotypic variability in camouflaged organisms, whereas aposematic organisms are expected to evolve a more uniform warning coloration. However, no comprehensive analysis of the phenotypic consequences of predator selection in aposematic and cryptic species exists. Using state-of-the-art image analysis, we examine 2800 wing images of 82 moth species accessed via three online museum databases. We test whether anti-predator strategy (i.e., camouflage or aposematism) explains intraspecific variation in wing colour and pattern across northern hemisphere moths. In addition, we test two mutually non-exclusive, ecological hypotheses to explain variation in colour pattern: diel-activity or dietary-niche. In this work, taking into account phylogenetic relationships, moth phenotypic variability is best explained by anti-predator strategy with camouflaged moths being more variable in wing patterning than aposematic species.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1678
Pages (from-to)1-12
Number of pages12
JournalNature Communications
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Feb 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this