Abstract
Information Systems can play an important role in ensuring and improving the quality of education provided. However, lack of acceptance of these information systems and resistance of technology innovations by the end users limit the expected benefits of the system. This research attempts to identify the key determinants for the acceptance of the Unit Guide Information Systems (UGIS) in the Australian higher education sector. The technology acceptance model (TAM), social cognitive theory (SCT) and model of PC utilization (MPCU) are combined to provide a new framework for this analysis. Results of the study are consistent with the technology acceptance factors for explaining the behavioural intention of the academics. The study also shows the effects of application specific self-efficacy, application specific anxiety and social influence on the acceptance of UGIS. Implications of the results are discussed within the context of unit guides and curriculum mapping. Atif, Richards and Bilgin
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | ACIS 2012: Location, Location, Location |
| Subtitle of host publication | Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems |
| Editors | John Lamp |
| Place of Publication | Melbourne |
| Publisher | Deakin University |
| Pages | 1-10 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781741561722 |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
| Event | 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2012 - Geelong, VIC, Australia Duration: 3 Dec 2012 → 5 Dec 2012 |
Other
| Other | 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, ACIS 2012 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Australia |
| City | Geelong, VIC |
| Period | 3/12/12 → 5/12/12 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s). Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting the acceptance of unit guide information systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 3 Citations
- 3 Conference proceeding contribution
-
A model for enhancing empowerment in farmers using mobile based information system
Ginige, T. & Richards, D., 2012, ACIS 2012: Location, Location, Location: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Lamp, J. (ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University, p. 1-10 10 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding contribution › peer-review
-
A theory of change framework for developing cross-faculty programs: An information systems perspective
Richards, D. & Marrone, M., 2012, ACIS 2012: Location, Location, Location: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Lamp, J. (ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University, p. 1-11 11 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding contribution › peer-review
Open AccessFile -
Estimating non-response bias in a web-based survey of technology acceptance: a case study of unit guide information systems
Atif, A., Richards, D. & Bilgin, A., 2012, ACIS 2012: Location, Location, Location: Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on Information Systems. Lamp, J. (ed.). Melbourne: Deakin University, p. 1-10 10 p.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding contribution › peer-review
Open AccessFile
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver