Predictors of remission and relapse in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a prospective cohort study

Premala Sureshkumar, Elisabeth M. Hodson*, Narelle S. Willis, Federica Barzi, Jonathan C. Craig

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    43 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Although most children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome will respond to corticosteroid therapy, 80-90 % suffer one or more relapses. Methods: Using Cox proportional hazard models, we analyzed predictors of remission and relapse in 1-year follow-up data on children aged below 15 years with new-onset nephrotic syndrome. Results: Of 129 children, 107 achieved remission with corticosteroid therapy and 86 subsequently relapsed. Boys achieved remission more often than girls (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.52, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.3). Boys relapsed significantly more frequently than girls (AHR 1.77, 95 % CI 1.11-2.83) and were more likely to have frequently relapsing disease (AHR 3.3, 95 % CI 1.18-9.23). The risk of first relapse increased with the number of days to first remission (AHR 1.02, 95 % CI 1.01-1.04). The risk for a frequently relapsing course increased with a shorter time from remission to first relapse (AHR 0.92, 95 % CI 0.87-0.97). Conclusions: In idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, boys are more likely to respond initially, more likely to relapse, and to be classified as having frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. A decrease in time from remission to first relapse predicts for a frequently relapsing course.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1039-1046
    Number of pages8
    JournalPediatric Nephrology
    Volume29
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014

    Keywords

    • childhood nephrotic syndrome
    • cohort study
    • remission
    • relapse

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of remission and relapse in idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a prospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this