Prevalence of types of perpetration: gender and patterns of intimate partner violence within a prison sample in Singapore

Jac Brown, Diane Chew

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

It has been reported in Western research on intimate partner violence (IPV) that there are similar rates between males and females (Filbert, 2010). The objective of this study was to compare male and female prisoners from Singapore on rates of IPV as well as the Johnson (2006) types of IPV. Women (n = 75) self-reported higher rates of physical IPV perpetration in the past year (64.0%) than (n = 75) did men (46.1%). Women reported similar rates of IPV for themselves and their partners in the past year (64.0%), while men reported slightly more physical IPV for themselves (46.1%) than they did for their female partners (41.3%). In line with Johnson (2006), rates of intimate terrorism were calculated between 5% and 7% for themselves and their partners, with little variation due to gender. Violent resistance (VR) was calculated at between 2.1% and 7%, with more female than male VR reported for women. Much higher rates of situational couple violence was calculated for both males and females, ranging from 53.3% to 66.7% in the past year, while mutual violent control was significantly lower, ranging from between 14.8% to 20.0%, with data being discussed in relation to patriarchal and family violence perspectives. We concluded that the rates of IPV between males and females were very similar as were the types of IPV. Further research with other cultures should be encouraged for comparison with Western samples.

LanguageEnglish
Pages883-901
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma
Volume27
Issue number8
Early online date5 Apr 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Prisons
Singapore
Corylus
Terrorism
Prisoners
Domestic Violence
Intimate Partner Violence
Research
Violence

Keywords

  • gender symmetry
  • intimate partner violence
  • intimate terrorism
  • mutual couple violence
  • prisoners
  • Singapore
  • situational couple violence
  • violent resistance

Cite this

@article{775f808c6b26430284be341f537ede10,
title = "Prevalence of types of perpetration: gender and patterns of intimate partner violence within a prison sample in Singapore",
abstract = "It has been reported in Western research on intimate partner violence (IPV) that there are similar rates between males and females (Filbert, 2010). The objective of this study was to compare male and female prisoners from Singapore on rates of IPV as well as the Johnson (2006) types of IPV. Women (n = 75) self-reported higher rates of physical IPV perpetration in the past year (64.0{\%}) than (n = 75) did men (46.1{\%}). Women reported similar rates of IPV for themselves and their partners in the past year (64.0{\%}), while men reported slightly more physical IPV for themselves (46.1{\%}) than they did for their female partners (41.3{\%}). In line with Johnson (2006), rates of intimate terrorism were calculated between 5{\%} and 7{\%} for themselves and their partners, with little variation due to gender. Violent resistance (VR) was calculated at between 2.1{\%} and 7{\%}, with more female than male VR reported for women. Much higher rates of situational couple violence was calculated for both males and females, ranging from 53.3{\%} to 66.7{\%} in the past year, while mutual violent control was significantly lower, ranging from between 14.8{\%} to 20.0{\%}, with data being discussed in relation to patriarchal and family violence perspectives. We concluded that the rates of IPV between males and females were very similar as were the types of IPV. Further research with other cultures should be encouraged for comparison with Western samples.",
keywords = "gender symmetry, intimate partner violence, intimate terrorism, mutual couple violence, prisoners, Singapore, situational couple violence, violent resistance",
author = "Jac Brown and Diane Chew",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/10926771.2017.1410744",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "883--901",
journal = "Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma",
issn = "1092-6771",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
number = "8",

}

Prevalence of types of perpetration : gender and patterns of intimate partner violence within a prison sample in Singapore. / Brown, Jac; Chew, Diane.

In: Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, Vol. 27, No. 8, 14.09.2018, p. 883-901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevalence of types of perpetration

T2 - Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma

AU - Brown, Jac

AU - Chew, Diane

PY - 2018/9/14

Y1 - 2018/9/14

N2 - It has been reported in Western research on intimate partner violence (IPV) that there are similar rates between males and females (Filbert, 2010). The objective of this study was to compare male and female prisoners from Singapore on rates of IPV as well as the Johnson (2006) types of IPV. Women (n = 75) self-reported higher rates of physical IPV perpetration in the past year (64.0%) than (n = 75) did men (46.1%). Women reported similar rates of IPV for themselves and their partners in the past year (64.0%), while men reported slightly more physical IPV for themselves (46.1%) than they did for their female partners (41.3%). In line with Johnson (2006), rates of intimate terrorism were calculated between 5% and 7% for themselves and their partners, with little variation due to gender. Violent resistance (VR) was calculated at between 2.1% and 7%, with more female than male VR reported for women. Much higher rates of situational couple violence was calculated for both males and females, ranging from 53.3% to 66.7% in the past year, while mutual violent control was significantly lower, ranging from between 14.8% to 20.0%, with data being discussed in relation to patriarchal and family violence perspectives. We concluded that the rates of IPV between males and females were very similar as were the types of IPV. Further research with other cultures should be encouraged for comparison with Western samples.

AB - It has been reported in Western research on intimate partner violence (IPV) that there are similar rates between males and females (Filbert, 2010). The objective of this study was to compare male and female prisoners from Singapore on rates of IPV as well as the Johnson (2006) types of IPV. Women (n = 75) self-reported higher rates of physical IPV perpetration in the past year (64.0%) than (n = 75) did men (46.1%). Women reported similar rates of IPV for themselves and their partners in the past year (64.0%), while men reported slightly more physical IPV for themselves (46.1%) than they did for their female partners (41.3%). In line with Johnson (2006), rates of intimate terrorism were calculated between 5% and 7% for themselves and their partners, with little variation due to gender. Violent resistance (VR) was calculated at between 2.1% and 7%, with more female than male VR reported for women. Much higher rates of situational couple violence was calculated for both males and females, ranging from 53.3% to 66.7% in the past year, while mutual violent control was significantly lower, ranging from between 14.8% to 20.0%, with data being discussed in relation to patriarchal and family violence perspectives. We concluded that the rates of IPV between males and females were very similar as were the types of IPV. Further research with other cultures should be encouraged for comparison with Western samples.

KW - gender symmetry

KW - intimate partner violence

KW - intimate terrorism

KW - mutual couple violence

KW - prisoners

KW - Singapore

KW - situational couple violence

KW - violent resistance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044957798&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10926771.2017.1410744

DO - 10.1080/10926771.2017.1410744

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 883

EP - 901

JO - Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma

JF - Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma

SN - 1092-6771

IS - 8

ER -