Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Privatism, privatisation and social distinction in master-planned residential estates

Robyn Dowling*, Rowland Atkinson, Pauline Mcguirk

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In Australia, master-planned residential estates (MPREs) are often discussed within an internationalised academic discourse around the privatisation and fortification of residential environments. Yet we know very little about the lifestyles, community forms and ways of living in MPREs. We report on the results of an extensive survey across the Sydney metropolitan area that investigated in detail the attractions of master-planned estate living, the socio-demographic composition of these neighbourhoods and patterns of social interaction within them. These data are analysed in terms of a typology of MPRE that encompasses a spectrum of privatism and securitisation: what we see as their open, symbolically enclosed and gated forms. We find that whilst these estates differ along dimensions such as patterns of neighbouring and use of facilities, strong commonalities exist. From this analysis, conclusions are drawn about the links between built form and processes of social distinction as well as their implications for urban planning.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)391-410
    Number of pages20
    JournalUrban Policy and Research
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2010

    Keywords

    • Master-planned residential estates
    • Privatisation
    • Privatism
    • Social distinction

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Privatism, privatisation and social distinction in master-planned residential estates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this