Proactivity and motivation in solving work problems: a test of methodology

Laura C. Kirby, Ben J. Searle

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper presents two studies that explore proactive problem solving and its antecedents using novel laboratory-based methods. In Study 1, 53 psychology students completed an in-basket task requiring proactive problem solving, with solution proactivity evaluated by judges. Study 2 replicated and extended the study with 167 employees. Both studies explored the role of different forms of motivation, as it has been speculated that only autonomous motivations should contribute to proactive behavior. Study 1 showed that those participants higher in intrinsic motivation were more proactive, while Study 2 showed that those participants higher in controlled motivations were less proactive. Studies showed a consistent difference between autonomous and controlled motivations in their relations with proactivity. Experimental methods appear to be a useful approach to examining factors influencing cognitive aspects of the proactivity process.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)41-51
    Number of pages11
    JournalBusiness Creativity and the Creative Economy
    Volume1
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Proactivity and motivation in solving work problems: a test of methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this