Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review studies reporting problems with information technology (IT) in health care and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes.

Materials and methods: We searched bibliographic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Science Citation Index Expanded from January 2004 to December 2015 for studies reporting problems with IT and their effects. A framework called the information value chain, which connects technology use to final outcome, was used to assess how IT problems affect user interaction, information receipt, decision-making, care processes, and patient outcomes. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

Results: Of the 34 studies identified, the majority (n=14, 41%) were analyses of incidents reported from 6 countries. There were 7 descriptive studies, 9 ethnographic studies, and 4 case reports. The types of IT problems were similar to those described in earlier classifications of safety problems associated with health IT. The frequency, scale, and severity of IT problems were not adequately captured within these studies. Use errors and poor user interfaces interfered with the receipt of information and led to errors of commission when making decisions. Clinical errors involving medications were well characterized. Issues with system functionality, including poor user interfaces and fragmented displays, delayed care delivery. Issues with system access, system configuration, and software updates also delayed care. In 18 studies (53%), IT problems were linked to patient harm and death. Near-miss events were reported in 10 studies (29%).

Discussion and conclusion: The research evidence describing problems with health IT remains largely qualitative, and many opportunities remain to systematically study and quantify risks and benefits with regard to patient safety. The information value chain, when used in conjunction with existing classifications for health IT safety problems, can enhancemeasurement and should facilitate identification of the most significant risks to patient safety.

LanguageEnglish
Article numberocw154
Pages246-260
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume24
Issue number2
Early online date23 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Medical Informatics
Patient Care
Technology
Patient Safety
Decision Making
Bibliographic Databases
Patient Harm
Safety
Medication Errors
Biomedical Technology
PubMed
Meta-Analysis
Software
Research

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Health information technology
  • Patient safety
  • Systematic review
  • Unintended consequences

Cite this

@article{541504c3c08740018d79ca4011df6835,
title = "Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes: a systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: To systematically review studies reporting problems with information technology (IT) in health care and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes. Materials and methods: We searched bibliographic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Science Citation Index Expanded from January 2004 to December 2015 for studies reporting problems with IT and their effects. A framework called the information value chain, which connects technology use to final outcome, was used to assess how IT problems affect user interaction, information receipt, decision-making, care processes, and patient outcomes. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Of the 34 studies identified, the majority (n=14, 41{\%}) were analyses of incidents reported from 6 countries. There were 7 descriptive studies, 9 ethnographic studies, and 4 case reports. The types of IT problems were similar to those described in earlier classifications of safety problems associated with health IT. The frequency, scale, and severity of IT problems were not adequately captured within these studies. Use errors and poor user interfaces interfered with the receipt of information and led to errors of commission when making decisions. Clinical errors involving medications were well characterized. Issues with system functionality, including poor user interfaces and fragmented displays, delayed care delivery. Issues with system access, system configuration, and software updates also delayed care. In 18 studies (53{\%}), IT problems were linked to patient harm and death. Near-miss events were reported in 10 studies (29{\%}). Discussion and conclusion: The research evidence describing problems with health IT remains largely qualitative, and many opportunities remain to systematically study and quantify risks and benefits with regard to patient safety. The information value chain, when used in conjunction with existing classifications for health IT safety problems, can enhancemeasurement and should facilitate identification of the most significant risks to patient safety.",
keywords = "Adverse events, Health information technology, Patient safety, Systematic review, Unintended consequences",
author = "Kim, {Mi Ok} and Enrico Coiera and Farah Magrabi",
note = "{\circledC} The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jamia/ocw154",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "246--260",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes : a systematic review. / Kim, Mi Ok; Coiera, Enrico; Magrabi, Farah.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 24, No. 2, ocw154, 01.03.2017, p. 246-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems with health information technology and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes

T2 - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

AU - Kim, Mi Ok

AU - Coiera, Enrico

AU - Magrabi, Farah

N1 - © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Objective: To systematically review studies reporting problems with information technology (IT) in health care and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes. Materials and methods: We searched bibliographic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Science Citation Index Expanded from January 2004 to December 2015 for studies reporting problems with IT and their effects. A framework called the information value chain, which connects technology use to final outcome, was used to assess how IT problems affect user interaction, information receipt, decision-making, care processes, and patient outcomes. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Of the 34 studies identified, the majority (n=14, 41%) were analyses of incidents reported from 6 countries. There were 7 descriptive studies, 9 ethnographic studies, and 4 case reports. The types of IT problems were similar to those described in earlier classifications of safety problems associated with health IT. The frequency, scale, and severity of IT problems were not adequately captured within these studies. Use errors and poor user interfaces interfered with the receipt of information and led to errors of commission when making decisions. Clinical errors involving medications were well characterized. Issues with system functionality, including poor user interfaces and fragmented displays, delayed care delivery. Issues with system access, system configuration, and software updates also delayed care. In 18 studies (53%), IT problems were linked to patient harm and death. Near-miss events were reported in 10 studies (29%). Discussion and conclusion: The research evidence describing problems with health IT remains largely qualitative, and many opportunities remain to systematically study and quantify risks and benefits with regard to patient safety. The information value chain, when used in conjunction with existing classifications for health IT safety problems, can enhancemeasurement and should facilitate identification of the most significant risks to patient safety.

AB - Objective: To systematically review studies reporting problems with information technology (IT) in health care and their effects on care delivery and patient outcomes. Materials and methods: We searched bibliographic databases including Scopus, PubMed, and Science Citation Index Expanded from January 2004 to December 2015 for studies reporting problems with IT and their effects. A framework called the information value chain, which connects technology use to final outcome, was used to assess how IT problems affect user interaction, information receipt, decision-making, care processes, and patient outcomes. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Results: Of the 34 studies identified, the majority (n=14, 41%) were analyses of incidents reported from 6 countries. There were 7 descriptive studies, 9 ethnographic studies, and 4 case reports. The types of IT problems were similar to those described in earlier classifications of safety problems associated with health IT. The frequency, scale, and severity of IT problems were not adequately captured within these studies. Use errors and poor user interfaces interfered with the receipt of information and led to errors of commission when making decisions. Clinical errors involving medications were well characterized. Issues with system functionality, including poor user interfaces and fragmented displays, delayed care delivery. Issues with system access, system configuration, and software updates also delayed care. In 18 studies (53%), IT problems were linked to patient harm and death. Near-miss events were reported in 10 studies (29%). Discussion and conclusion: The research evidence describing problems with health IT remains largely qualitative, and many opportunities remain to systematically study and quantify risks and benefits with regard to patient safety. The information value chain, when used in conjunction with existing classifications for health IT safety problems, can enhancemeasurement and should facilitate identification of the most significant risks to patient safety.

KW - Adverse events

KW - Health information technology

KW - Patient safety

KW - Systematic review

KW - Unintended consequences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016267372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jamia/ocw154

DO - 10.1093/jamia/ocw154

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 246

EP - 260

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 2

M1 - ocw154

ER -