Procreative reasons-relevance: On the moral significance of why we have children

Mianna Lotz*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)


Advances in reproductive technologies - in particular in genetic screening and selection - have occasioned renewed interest in the moral justifiability of the reasons that motivate the decision to have a child. The capacity to select for desired blood and tissue compatibilities has led to the much discussed 'saviour sibling' cases in which parents seek to 'have one child to save another'. Heightened interest in procreative reasons is to be welcomed, since it prompts a more general philosophical interrogation of the grounds for moral appraisal of reasons-to-parent, and of the extent to which such reasons are relevant to the moral assessment of procreation itself. I start by rejecting the idea that we can use a distinction between 'other-regarding' and 'future-child-regarding' reasons as a basis on which to distinguish good from bad procreative reasons. I then offer and evaluate three potential grounds for elucidating and establishing a relationship between procreative motivation and the rightnesswrongness of procreative conduct: the predictiveness, the verdictiveness, and the expressiveness of procreative reasons.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-299
Number of pages9
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'Procreative reasons-relevance: On the moral significance of why we have children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this