Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Key elements in structured histopathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens

James G. Kench*, David R. Clouston, Warick Delprado, Thomas Eade, David Ellis, Lisa G. Horvath, Hemamali Samaratunga, Jurgen Stahl, Alan M F Stapleton, Lars Egevad, John R. Srigley, Brett Delahunt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common visceral cancer and the second most common cause of cancer death in males. The number of radical prostatectomies performed each year is increasing and accurate data from the histopathological examination of these specimens aid clinicians in stratifying patients for surveillance and adjuvant therapies. This review focuses on the histopathological prognostic factors which should be routinely recorded in pathology reports and complements the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Structured Reporting Protocol for Prostate Cancer (Radical Prostatectomy). Such structured pathology reports have been shown to significantly enhance the completeness and quality of data provided to clinicians. The review also discusses the International Society for Urological Pathology Consensus Conference recommendations which were published recently.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-419
Number of pages10
JournalPathology
Volume43
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Pathology
  • Prognostic factors
  • Prostate cancer
  • Radical prostatectomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic factors in prostate cancer. Key elements in structured histopathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this