Promoting a team ball game (lifeball) to older people: Who does this game attract and who continues?

Sue Green*, Elizabeth Campbell, Lisa Barnett, Rebecca Mitchell, Deborah Radvan, Eric Van Beurden

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)


Issue addressed: To describe the demographic and health-related characteristics (physical activity, self-reported health status, quality of life and falls history) of older people who enrol in a team-based game, Lifeball, and examine associations between continuation and participant characteristics. Reasons for stopping, participants' perceptions of the game and changes in health-related characteristics over 12 months were examined. Methods: Telephone surveys were conducted with a cohort of Lifeball players at: baseline, soon after commencing playing and 12 months later. Results: At baseline, participants were aged 40 to 96 years (mean 67). Most were female (84%), in good to excellent health (86%) and reported being sufficiently (>150 minutes per week) physically active (69%). Almost half (43%) were still playing 12 months later (continuers). Continuers were more likely to perceive Lifeball had helped them to: feel fitter and healthier (91%); improve their social life (73%); and be more active (53%). No significant changes in continuers' physical activity, self-reported health status and quality of life measures were reported. The main reason for stopping playing was illness/injury unrelated to Lifeball. Conclusions: Lifeball mainly appealed to healthy, active older people.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)120-126
Number of pages7
JournalHealth Promotion Journal of Australia
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting a team ball game (lifeball) to older people: Who does this game attract and who continues?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this