TY - JOUR
T1 - Property and the governance of the family farm in rural Australia
AU - Voyce, Malcolm
PY - 2007/6
Y1 - 2007/6
N2 - This article examines the social side of the property-holding relationship between rural families in rural Australia. I assume that property is a social relationship as well as form of technology. I argue that the technology of property is not neutral, but has social implications. My approach is to assume that settlers had various ideas of property, a core stratum of which was manipulated and governed by the state. At the same time the technical side of property, resting on the sciences of cartography, mapping and surveying, allowed the state to settle farmers on land in a controlled way to ensure productivity and social control. Thus, through stimulating ideas of freedom associated with property, the colonial state assisted the orderly development of the Australian continent.
AB - This article examines the social side of the property-holding relationship between rural families in rural Australia. I assume that property is a social relationship as well as form of technology. I argue that the technology of property is not neutral, but has social implications. My approach is to assume that settlers had various ideas of property, a core stratum of which was manipulated and governed by the state. At the same time the technical side of property, resting on the sciences of cartography, mapping and surveying, allowed the state to settle farmers on land in a controlled way to ensure productivity and social control. Thus, through stimulating ideas of freedom associated with property, the colonial state assisted the orderly development of the Australian continent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248592723&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1440783307076892
DO - 10.1177/1440783307076892
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34248592723
SN - 1440-7833
VL - 43
SP - 131
EP - 150
JO - Journal of Sociology
JF - Journal of Sociology
IS - 2
ER -