Abstract
This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of patient- controlled sedation (PCS) using propofol during awake seizure surgery performed tinder bupivacaine scalp blocks. Thirty-seven patients were randomized to receive either propofol PCS combined with a basal infusion of propofol (n = 20) or neurolept analgesia using an initial bolus dose of fentanyl and droperidol followed by a fentanyl infusion (n = 17). Both groups received supplemental fentanyl and dimenhydrinate for intraoperative pain and nausea, respectively. Comparisons were made between groups for sedation, memory, and cognitive function, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications. Levels of intraoperative sedation and patient satisfaction were similar between groups. Memory and cognitive function were well preserved in both groups. The incidence of transient episodes of ventilatory rate depression (<8 bpm) was more frequent among the propofol patients (5 vs 0, P = 0.04), particularly after supplemental doses of opioid. Intraoperative seizures were more common among the neurolept patients (7 vs 0, P = 0.002). PCS using propofol represents an effective alternative to neurolept analgesia during awake seizure surgery performed in a monitored care environment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1285-1291 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Anesthesia and Analgesia |
Volume | 84 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1997 |
Externally published | Yes |