Prosodic effects on the planning of inserted /ɹ/ in Australian English

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

V1.V2 hiatus is disallowed in many languages. In several varieties of English, when V1 is non-high, hiatus may be resolved by glottalization or /ɹ/ insertion. However, it is not well understood why speakers choose one over the other. In addition, questions remain about how foot boundary influences the hiatus-breaking strategy and whether perceived /ɹ/ is a phonetic transition or segmental insertion. Using an elicited production task, we investigated the effect of foot boundary on hiatus resolution and examined whether perceived inserted /ɹ/ exerts co-articulatory influence on V1 onset as predicted if it is segmental. Hiatus contexts were constructed from two types of coda-less nouns to generate V1 (e.g. paw without orthographic ‘r’ door with orthographic ‘r’) followed by one of three onset-less prepositions (‘under’ ‘above’ ‘of’). Foot boundary locations were manipulated in three metrical conditions to examine gradient influence of foot boundary proximity (e.g. ‘This is the [paw] under the dog’ ‘This is the [paw a]bove the dog’ ‘This is the [paw of the] dog’). Results showed complementarity between glottalization and /ɹ/ insertion. Expanding the distance between the hiatus and foot boundary increased the use of /ɹ/ and decreased glottalization. F3 lowering at V1 onset occurred in perceived /ɹ/ contexts, providing acoustic evidence for inserted segmental /ɹ/.

LanguageEnglish
Pages29-42
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Phonetics
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Fingerprint

Foot
planning
Dogs
phonetics
acoustics
Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome
Phonetics
Acoustics
language
Language
evidence
Australian English
Hiatus
Planning
Glottalization
Insertion
Dog
Onset
Orthographic

Keywords

  • /ɹ/ insertion
  • speech planning
  • Australian English
  • hiatus

Cite this

@article{782896f8e8984e05bf64c73cc52efde2,
title = "Prosodic effects on the planning of inserted /ɹ/ in Australian English",
abstract = "V1.V2 hiatus is disallowed in many languages. In several varieties of English, when V1 is non-high, hiatus may be resolved by glottalization or /ɹ/ insertion. However, it is not well understood why speakers choose one over the other. In addition, questions remain about how foot boundary influences the hiatus-breaking strategy and whether perceived /ɹ/ is a phonetic transition or segmental insertion. Using an elicited production task, we investigated the effect of foot boundary on hiatus resolution and examined whether perceived inserted /ɹ/ exerts co-articulatory influence on V1 onset as predicted if it is segmental. Hiatus contexts were constructed from two types of coda-less nouns to generate V1 (e.g. paw without orthographic ‘r’ door with orthographic ‘r’) followed by one of three onset-less prepositions (‘under’ ‘above’ ‘of’). Foot boundary locations were manipulated in three metrical conditions to examine gradient influence of foot boundary proximity (e.g. ‘This is the [paw] under the dog’ ‘This is the [paw a]bove the dog’ ‘This is the [paw of the] dog’). Results showed complementarity between glottalization and /ɹ/ insertion. Expanding the distance between the hiatus and foot boundary increased the use of /ɹ/ and decreased glottalization. F3 lowering at V1 onset occurred in perceived /ɹ/ contexts, providing acoustic evidence for inserted segmental /ɹ/.",
keywords = "/ɹ/ insertion, speech planning, Australian English, hiatus",
author = "Ivan Yuen and Felicity Cox and Katherine Demuth",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.003",
language = "English",
volume = "69",
pages = "29--42",
journal = "Journal of Phonetics",
issn = "0095-4470",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

Prosodic effects on the planning of inserted /ɹ/ in Australian English. / Yuen, Ivan; Cox, Felicity; Demuth, Katherine.

In: Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 69, 01.07.2018, p. 29-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosodic effects on the planning of inserted /ɹ/ in Australian English

AU - Yuen, Ivan

AU - Cox, Felicity

AU - Demuth, Katherine

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - V1.V2 hiatus is disallowed in many languages. In several varieties of English, when V1 is non-high, hiatus may be resolved by glottalization or /ɹ/ insertion. However, it is not well understood why speakers choose one over the other. In addition, questions remain about how foot boundary influences the hiatus-breaking strategy and whether perceived /ɹ/ is a phonetic transition or segmental insertion. Using an elicited production task, we investigated the effect of foot boundary on hiatus resolution and examined whether perceived inserted /ɹ/ exerts co-articulatory influence on V1 onset as predicted if it is segmental. Hiatus contexts were constructed from two types of coda-less nouns to generate V1 (e.g. paw without orthographic ‘r’ door with orthographic ‘r’) followed by one of three onset-less prepositions (‘under’ ‘above’ ‘of’). Foot boundary locations were manipulated in three metrical conditions to examine gradient influence of foot boundary proximity (e.g. ‘This is the [paw] under the dog’ ‘This is the [paw a]bove the dog’ ‘This is the [paw of the] dog’). Results showed complementarity between glottalization and /ɹ/ insertion. Expanding the distance between the hiatus and foot boundary increased the use of /ɹ/ and decreased glottalization. F3 lowering at V1 onset occurred in perceived /ɹ/ contexts, providing acoustic evidence for inserted segmental /ɹ/.

AB - V1.V2 hiatus is disallowed in many languages. In several varieties of English, when V1 is non-high, hiatus may be resolved by glottalization or /ɹ/ insertion. However, it is not well understood why speakers choose one over the other. In addition, questions remain about how foot boundary influences the hiatus-breaking strategy and whether perceived /ɹ/ is a phonetic transition or segmental insertion. Using an elicited production task, we investigated the effect of foot boundary on hiatus resolution and examined whether perceived inserted /ɹ/ exerts co-articulatory influence on V1 onset as predicted if it is segmental. Hiatus contexts were constructed from two types of coda-less nouns to generate V1 (e.g. paw without orthographic ‘r’ door with orthographic ‘r’) followed by one of three onset-less prepositions (‘under’ ‘above’ ‘of’). Foot boundary locations were manipulated in three metrical conditions to examine gradient influence of foot boundary proximity (e.g. ‘This is the [paw] under the dog’ ‘This is the [paw a]bove the dog’ ‘This is the [paw of the] dog’). Results showed complementarity between glottalization and /ɹ/ insertion. Expanding the distance between the hiatus and foot boundary increased the use of /ɹ/ and decreased glottalization. F3 lowering at V1 onset occurred in perceived /ɹ/ contexts, providing acoustic evidence for inserted segmental /ɹ/.

KW - /ɹ/ insertion

KW - speech planning

KW - Australian English

KW - hiatus

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047068259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/CE110001021

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/FL130100014

U2 - 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.wocn.2018.04.003

M3 - Article

VL - 69

SP - 29

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Phonetics

T2 - Journal of Phonetics

JF - Journal of Phonetics

SN - 0095-4470

ER -