Provisional measures and provisional arrangements in maritime boundary disputes

Natalie Klein*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the interaction under LOSC of the powers of international courts and tribunals to order binding provisional measures and the obligation of states to make every effort to enter into provisional arrangements pending the delimitation of a maritime boundary. The importance of provisional measures or arrangements in delimiting maritime boundaries, previous state and judicial practice related to provisional arrangements and measures, and the relevant substantive and procedural rules under LOSC are all explored as a means of explaining how courts and tribunals should exercise their powers of ordering provisional measures when provisional arrangements are required. It is argued here that an international court or tribunal should exercise caution in order to ensure that the procedural mechanism complements, rather than conflicts with, the substantive obligation. To this end, provisional measures entailing recommendations, duties of cooperation and obligations of non-aggravation are to be preferred.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-460
Number of pages38
JournalInternational Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2006

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Provisional measures and provisional arrangements in maritime boundary disputes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this