Psychoanalysis, self-deception, and the problem of teleology

Simon Boag*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review


Explaining how both repression and self-deception occur provides an ongoing challenge for both psychology and philosophy. This chapter examines repression and self-deception in light of the static and dynamic paradoxes of self-deception and the problem of knowing in order not to know. The chapter first addresses these logical paradoxes to both clarify where the actual problems lie and to identify problematic strategies for explaining the harder cases of repression and self-deception. From this, strongly partitive accounts of the mind and the role of intentions and teleology in repression and self-deception are then addressed. The problem of teleology in functional accounts of repression is then discussed in the context of ‘betrayal blindness’ found within Betrayal Trauma theory. After demonstrating that teleology prevents such approaches from providing coherent theories of repression and self-deception, a realist-relational view of mentality is developed for addressing the logical difficulty with such positions. An alternative non-teleological account of betrayal blindness based on efficient causes is then proffered in terms of Freud’s account of the ‘blindness of the seeing eye’, which embraces an apparent paradox with respect to both knowing and not knowing the repressed simultaneously.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge international handbook of psychoanalysis and philosophy
EditorsAner Govrin, Tair Caspi
Place of PublicationAbingdon, Oxon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9780429297076
ISBN (Print)9780367276454, 9781032365251
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameThe Routledge International Handbook Series


  • psychoanalysis
  • teleology


Dive into the research topics of 'Psychoanalysis, self-deception, and the problem of teleology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this