Public discourse and decision-making: exploring possibilities for financial, social, and environmental accounting

Gordon Boyce

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Economic “development” involves processes that often jointly produce both goods and “bads” — economic, environmental and social. The bads, however, are often technologically invisible; not least in terms of the way decisions are informed and accounted for. This paper takes as its case study a major development proposal that had the potential to produce economic, environmental, and social goods and bads. The paper involves an exploration of official independent reports leading to the proposal, considering the various factors taken into the decision, how the processes were reported on and accounted for. In particular, the treatment of financial/economic factors is examined and compared and contrasted with the treatment of social/environmental factors. From this, the paper considers possibilities for financial, social and environmental accounting in public discourse and decision making. In particular, the use of accounting to create environmental and social visibilities, and to facilitate discourse and debate, is examined.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-64
Number of pages38
JournalAccounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2000

Keywords

  • Environmental audit
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Public sector
  • Social accounting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public discourse and decision-making: exploring possibilities for financial, social, and environmental accounting'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this