Public trust and global biobank networks

Lisa Dive*, Christine Critchley, Margaret Otlowski, Paul Mason, Miriam Wiersma, Edwina Light, Cameron Stewart, Ian Kerridge, Wendy Lipworth

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)
41 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Biobanks provide an important foundation for genomic and personalised medicine. In order to enhance their scientific power and scope, they are increasingly becoming part of national or international networks. Public trust is essential in fostering public engagement, encouraging donation to, and facilitating public funding for biobanks. Globalisation and networking of biobanking may challenge this trust.

Methods: We report the results of an Australian study examining public attitudes to the networking and globalisation of biobanks. The study used quantitative and qualitative methods in conjunction with bioethical analysis in order to determine factors that may contribute to, and threaten, trust.

Results: Our results indicate a generally high level of trust in biobanks and in medical research more broadly. Key factors that can reduce perceived trustworthiness of biobanks are commercialisation and involvement in global networking.

Conclusions: We conclude that robust ethical oversight and governance standards can both promote trust in global biobanking and ensure that this trust is warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Article number73
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalBMC Medical Ethics
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Aug 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Biobanks
  • Commercialisation
  • Globalisation
  • Trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public trust and global biobank networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this