Abstract
Infants in the Australian and UK Benefits of Oxygen Saturation Targeting-II trials treated using revised oximeters spent more time within their planned pulse oximeter saturation target ranges than infants treated using the original oximeters (P <.001). This may explain the larger mortality difference seen with revised oximeters. If so, average treatment effects from the Neonatal Oxygen Prospective Meta-analysis trials may be underestimates.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 301-304.e2 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Pediatrics |
| Volume | 204 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2019 |
Keywords
- blindness/epidemiology
- blindness/etiology
- cerebral palsy/epidemiology
- enterocolitis, necrotizing/epidemiology
- enterocolitis, necrotizing/etiology
- humans
- incidence
- infant
- infant mortality
- infant, extremely premature
- infant, newborn
- oximetry
- oxygen/administration & dosage
- oxygen/adverse effects
- oxygen/blood
- trial
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pulse oximeter saturation targeting and oximeter changes in the benefits of oxygen saturation targeting (BOOST)-II Australia and BOOST-II UK oxygen trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver