Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid

Kerry A. Sherman, Laura Kate Shaw, Lone Jørgensen, Diana Harcourt, Linda Cameron, John Boyages, Elisabeth Elder, Judy Kirk, Katherine Tucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and those with a genetic susceptibility to developing this disease face the challenging decision of whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction following mastectomy. As part of a large randomized controlled trial, this qualitative study examined women's experiences of using the Breast RECONstruction Decision Aid (BRECONDA) and health professionals' feedback regarding the impact of this resource on patients' knowledge and decision making about breast reconstruction. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with women who accessed the BRECONDA intervention (N = 36) and with their healthcare providers (N = 6). All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis by 3 independent coders. Results: Participants reported an overall positive impression, with all interviewees endorsing this decision aid as a useful resource for women considering reconstructive surgery. Thematic analysis of patient interviews revealed 4 themes: overall impressions and aesthetics; personal relevance and utility; introducing BRECONDA; and advantages and suggested improvements. Analysis of health professionals' interviews also revealed 4 themes: need for BRECONDA, impact of BRECONDA, potential difficulties that may arise in using the decision aid, and recommending BRECONDA to patients. Patients indicated that they derived benefit from this resource at all stages of their decision-making process, with the greatest perceived benefit being for those early in their breast reconstruction journey. Conclusion: These findings support the use of BRECONDA as an adjunct to clinical consultation and other information sources.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1618-1624
Number of pages7
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume26
Issue number10
Early online date30 Jan 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Decision Support Techniques
Mammaplasty
Health
Interviews
Decision Making
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating
Mastectomy
Genetic Predisposition to Disease
Esthetics
Health Personnel
Referral and Consultation
Randomized Controlled Trials
Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

  • BRCA
  • breast reconstruction
  • cancer
  • decision aid
  • oncology
  • user experience

Cite this

Sherman, Kerry A. ; Shaw, Laura Kate ; Jørgensen, Lone ; Harcourt, Diana ; Cameron, Linda ; Boyages, John ; Elder, Elisabeth ; Kirk, Judy ; Tucker, Katherine. / Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid. In: Psycho-Oncology. 2017 ; Vol. 26, No. 10. pp. 1618-1624.
@article{b669fc41ff254dfea202ebc41d67105a,
title = "Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid",
abstract = "Objective: Women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and those with a genetic susceptibility to developing this disease face the challenging decision of whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction following mastectomy. As part of a large randomized controlled trial, this qualitative study examined women's experiences of using the Breast RECONstruction Decision Aid (BRECONDA) and health professionals' feedback regarding the impact of this resource on patients' knowledge and decision making about breast reconstruction. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with women who accessed the BRECONDA intervention (N = 36) and with their healthcare providers (N = 6). All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis by 3 independent coders. Results: Participants reported an overall positive impression, with all interviewees endorsing this decision aid as a useful resource for women considering reconstructive surgery. Thematic analysis of patient interviews revealed 4 themes: overall impressions and aesthetics; personal relevance and utility; introducing BRECONDA; and advantages and suggested improvements. Analysis of health professionals' interviews also revealed 4 themes: need for BRECONDA, impact of BRECONDA, potential difficulties that may arise in using the decision aid, and recommending BRECONDA to patients. Patients indicated that they derived benefit from this resource at all stages of their decision-making process, with the greatest perceived benefit being for those early in their breast reconstruction journey. Conclusion: These findings support the use of BRECONDA as an adjunct to clinical consultation and other information sources.",
keywords = "BRCA, breast reconstruction, cancer, decision aid, oncology, user experience",
author = "Sherman, {Kerry A.} and Shaw, {Laura Kate} and Lone J{\o}rgensen and Diana Harcourt and Linda Cameron and John Boyages and Elisabeth Elder and Judy Kirk and Katherine Tucker",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/pon.4346",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1618--1624",
journal = "Psycho‐Oncology",
issn = "1057-9249",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "10",

}

Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid. / Sherman, Kerry A.; Shaw, Laura Kate; Jørgensen, Lone; Harcourt, Diana; Cameron, Linda; Boyages, John; Elder, Elisabeth; Kirk, Judy; Tucker, Katherine.

In: Psycho-Oncology, Vol. 26, No. 10, 10.2017, p. 1618-1624.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitatively understanding patients' and health professionals' experiences of the BRECONDA breast reconstruction decision aid

AU - Sherman, Kerry A.

AU - Shaw, Laura Kate

AU - Jørgensen, Lone

AU - Harcourt, Diana

AU - Cameron, Linda

AU - Boyages, John

AU - Elder, Elisabeth

AU - Kirk, Judy

AU - Tucker, Katherine

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - Objective: Women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and those with a genetic susceptibility to developing this disease face the challenging decision of whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction following mastectomy. As part of a large randomized controlled trial, this qualitative study examined women's experiences of using the Breast RECONstruction Decision Aid (BRECONDA) and health professionals' feedback regarding the impact of this resource on patients' knowledge and decision making about breast reconstruction. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with women who accessed the BRECONDA intervention (N = 36) and with their healthcare providers (N = 6). All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis by 3 independent coders. Results: Participants reported an overall positive impression, with all interviewees endorsing this decision aid as a useful resource for women considering reconstructive surgery. Thematic analysis of patient interviews revealed 4 themes: overall impressions and aesthetics; personal relevance and utility; introducing BRECONDA; and advantages and suggested improvements. Analysis of health professionals' interviews also revealed 4 themes: need for BRECONDA, impact of BRECONDA, potential difficulties that may arise in using the decision aid, and recommending BRECONDA to patients. Patients indicated that they derived benefit from this resource at all stages of their decision-making process, with the greatest perceived benefit being for those early in their breast reconstruction journey. Conclusion: These findings support the use of BRECONDA as an adjunct to clinical consultation and other information sources.

AB - Objective: Women diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ and those with a genetic susceptibility to developing this disease face the challenging decision of whether or not to undergo breast reconstruction following mastectomy. As part of a large randomized controlled trial, this qualitative study examined women's experiences of using the Breast RECONstruction Decision Aid (BRECONDA) and health professionals' feedback regarding the impact of this resource on patients' knowledge and decision making about breast reconstruction. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with women who accessed the BRECONDA intervention (N = 36) and with their healthcare providers (N = 6). All interviews were transcribed verbatim and subjected to thematic analysis by 3 independent coders. Results: Participants reported an overall positive impression, with all interviewees endorsing this decision aid as a useful resource for women considering reconstructive surgery. Thematic analysis of patient interviews revealed 4 themes: overall impressions and aesthetics; personal relevance and utility; introducing BRECONDA; and advantages and suggested improvements. Analysis of health professionals' interviews also revealed 4 themes: need for BRECONDA, impact of BRECONDA, potential difficulties that may arise in using the decision aid, and recommending BRECONDA to patients. Patients indicated that they derived benefit from this resource at all stages of their decision-making process, with the greatest perceived benefit being for those early in their breast reconstruction journey. Conclusion: These findings support the use of BRECONDA as an adjunct to clinical consultation and other information sources.

KW - BRCA

KW - breast reconstruction

KW - cancer

KW - decision aid

KW - oncology

KW - user experience

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011636483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/pon.4346

DO - 10.1002/pon.4346

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1618

EP - 1624

JO - Psycho‐Oncology

T2 - Psycho‐Oncology

JF - Psycho‐Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 10

ER -