Quality leadership and quality control

Tony Badrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Different quality control rules detect different analytical errors with varying levels of efficiency depending on the type of error present, its prevalence and the number of observations. The efficiency of a rule can be gauged by inspection of a power function graph. Control rules are only part of a process and not an end in itself; just as important are the trouble-shooting systems employed when a failure occurs. 'Average of patient normals' may develop as a usual adjunct to conventional quality control serum based programmes. Acceptable error can be based on various criteria; biological variation is probably the most sensible. Once determined, acceptable error can be used as limits in quality control rule systems. A key aspect of an organisation is leadership, which links the various components of the quality system. Leadership is difficult to characterise but its key aspects include trust, setting an example, developing staff and critically setting the vision for the organisation. Organisations also have internal characteristics such as the degree of formalisation, centralisation, and complexity. Medical organisations can have internal tensions because of the dichotomy between the bureaucratic and the shadow medical structures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-93
Number of pages13
JournalClinical Biochemist Reviews
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2003
Externally publishedYes


  • Journal Article


Dive into the research topics of 'Quality leadership and quality control'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this