Racialization: a defense of the concept

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Citations (Scopus)


This paper defends the concept of racialization against its critics. As the concept has become increasingly popular, questions about its meaning and value have been raised, and a backlash against its use has occurred. I argue that when “racialization” is properly understood, criticisms of the concept are unsuccessful. I defend a definition of racialization and identify its companion concept, “racialized group.” Racialization is often used as a synonym for “racial formation.” I argue that this is a mistake. Racial formation theory is committed to racial ontology, but racialization is best understood as the process through which racialized – rather than racial – groups are formed. “Racialization” plays a unique role in the conceptual landscape, and it is a key concept for race eliminativists and anti-realists about race.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1245-1262
Number of pages18
JournalEthnic and Racial Studies
Issue number8
Early online date17 Oct 2018
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2019


  • race
  • racialization
  • racial formation
  • racism
  • racialized group
  • social constructionism about race


Dive into the research topics of 'Racialization: a defense of the concept'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this