TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages
T2 - a systematic review and preclinical evaluation
AU - Assem, Yusuf
AU - Mobbs, Ralph J.
AU - Pelletier, Matthew H.
AU - Phan, Kevin
AU - Walsh, William R.
PY - 2017/3
Y1 - 2017/3
N2 - Purpose: The primary objective of this paper was to provide a systematic review of the available clinical studies of Ti/PEEK combined cages in spinal interbody fusion surgeries, focusing on their radiological and clinical outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide a review and evaluation of the in vitro and preclinical studies reported on Ti/PEEK-coated implants. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in March 2015 via three databases: Medline, Embase and Cochrane library. The following key search terms were combined with synonyms to identify relevant articles: “spinal fusion,” “PEEK,” “titanium” and “cage.” Results: The novelty of this intervention translates into a paucity of clinical trials, albeit the results of the seven clinical studies that met the criteria for inclusion are promising. All studies reported rate of fusion as a primary outcome. Two studies reported slightly improved fusion in the experimental Ti/PEEK combination cohort, one study identical fusion (91.7 %) and three studies excellent fusion (96, 100 and 94 %) in the Ti/PEEK cohort, although no differences reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Clinical studies at this early stage demonstrate that Ti/PEEK implants are safe and efficacious, exhibiting similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared to the current standard PEEK. There is clinical evidence substantiating the improved radiographic fusion of Ti/PEEK, albeit the differences were not significant. This field is promising, gaining substantial popularity, and further clinical trials are needed in the future to establish Ti/PEEK cages as a mainstay of clinical practice.
AB - Purpose: The primary objective of this paper was to provide a systematic review of the available clinical studies of Ti/PEEK combined cages in spinal interbody fusion surgeries, focusing on their radiological and clinical outcomes. A secondary aim was to provide a review and evaluation of the in vitro and preclinical studies reported on Ti/PEEK-coated implants. Methods: A systematic search of the literature was performed in March 2015 via three databases: Medline, Embase and Cochrane library. The following key search terms were combined with synonyms to identify relevant articles: “spinal fusion,” “PEEK,” “titanium” and “cage.” Results: The novelty of this intervention translates into a paucity of clinical trials, albeit the results of the seven clinical studies that met the criteria for inclusion are promising. All studies reported rate of fusion as a primary outcome. Two studies reported slightly improved fusion in the experimental Ti/PEEK combination cohort, one study identical fusion (91.7 %) and three studies excellent fusion (96, 100 and 94 %) in the Ti/PEEK cohort, although no differences reached statistical significance. Conclusions: Clinical studies at this early stage demonstrate that Ti/PEEK implants are safe and efficacious, exhibiting similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes compared to the current standard PEEK. There is clinical evidence substantiating the improved radiographic fusion of Ti/PEEK, albeit the differences were not significant. This field is promising, gaining substantial popularity, and further clinical trials are needed in the future to establish Ti/PEEK cages as a mainstay of clinical practice.
KW - spinal fusion
KW - cage
KW - ttanium
KW - PEEK
KW - Ti/PEEK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949936277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-015-4353-8
DO - 10.1007/s00586-015-4353-8
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26671514
AN - SCOPUS:84949936277
SN - 0940-6719
VL - 26
SP - 593
EP - 605
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
IS - 3
ER -