Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Hector Pacheco-Fuentes; Christine E. Cooper; Philip C. Withers; Simon C. Griffith

doi:10.1093/conphys/coac010

Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Hector Pacheco-Fuentes^*, Christine E. Cooper, Philip C. Withers, Simon C. Griffith

^*Corresponding author for this work

School of Natural Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.

Original language	English
Article number	coac010
Pages (from-to)	1-7
Number of pages	7
Journal	Conservation Physiology
Volume	10
Issue number	1
Early online date	10 Mar 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coac010
Publication status	Published - 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Access to Document

10.1093/conphys/coac010

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 520 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{28608463e6bb4174a8311439a26ca5cc,

title = "Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)",

abstract = "Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated. ",

author = "Hector Pacheco-Fuentes and Cooper, {Christine E.} and Withers, {Philip C.} and Griffith, {Simon C.}",

note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher. ",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1093/conphys/coac010",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "1--7",

journal = "Conservation Physiology",

issn = "2051-1434",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020). / Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector; Cooper, Christine E.; Withers, Philip C. et al.
In: Conservation Physiology, Vol. 10, No. 1, coac010, 2022, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted

T2 - a response to Conradie et al. (2020)

AU - Pacheco-Fuentes, Hector

AU - Cooper, Christine E.

AU - Withers, Philip C.

AU - Griffith, Simon C.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2022. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.

AB - Conradie et al. (2020) recently modelled the vulnerability of Australian arid birds to a changing climate. While the approach used by Conradie et al. (2020) is valuable, we argue that key assumptions in their study are poorly supported and the risks of a changing climate to arid zone avifauna are consequently overstated.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127520332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP170103619

U2 - 10.1093/conphys/coac010

DO - 10.1093/conphys/coac010

M3 - Comment/opinion

C2 - 35492422

AN - SCOPUS:85127520332

SN - 2051-1434

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Conservation Physiology

JF - Conservation Physiology

IS - 1

M1 - coac010

ER -

Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

The challenge of growing in a hot climate

Cite this

Re-evaluating model assumptions suggests that Australian birds are more tolerant of heat and aridity than predicted: a response to Conradie et al. (2020)

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Projects

The challenge of growing in a hot climate

Cite this