Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception: Evidence from two temporal attention tasks

Daniel Guilbert, Steven B. Most, Kim Curby

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The visual system has been found to prioritise emotional stimuli so robustly that their presence can temporarily “blind” people to non-emotional targets in their direct line of vision. This has ostensible implications for the real world: medics must not be blinded to important information despite the trauma they confront, and drivers must not be blinded when passing emotionally engaging billboards. One possibility is that the familiarity of goal-relevant information can protect people’s perception of it despite emotional distraction (e.g. drivers’ perception might be less impaired by graphic ads when on a familiar road). In two experiments, we tested whether familiarity renders targets more perceptible following the presentation of an emotional distractor in two temporal attention tasks, emotion-induced blindness (Experiment 1) and the attentional blink (Experiment 2). Targets were pictures of familiar or unfamiliar locations. Although, overall, familiar targets were seen better than unfamiliar targets in both studies, stimulus familiarity did not reduce the relative perceptual impairments caused by emotional distractors.

LanguageEnglish
Number of pages12
JournalCognition and Emotion
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 8 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Attentional Blink
Blindness
Emotions
Wounds and Injuries
Recognition (Psychology)
Emotion
Disruption
Susceptibility
Familiarity
Real World
Experiment
Distractor
Stimulus
Trauma
Ads
Impairment
Roads
Render
Distraction
Billboards

Cite this

@article{3275972e081c4131a3b20e6b48b2fc7e,
title = "Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception: Evidence from two temporal attention tasks",
abstract = "The visual system has been found to prioritise emotional stimuli so robustly that their presence can temporarily “blind” people to non-emotional targets in their direct line of vision. This has ostensible implications for the real world: medics must not be blinded to important information despite the trauma they confront, and drivers must not be blinded when passing emotionally engaging billboards. One possibility is that the familiarity of goal-relevant information can protect people’s perception of it despite emotional distraction (e.g. drivers’ perception might be less impaired by graphic ads when on a familiar road). In two experiments, we tested whether familiarity renders targets more perceptible following the presentation of an emotional distractor in two temporal attention tasks, emotion-induced blindness (Experiment 1) and the attentional blink (Experiment 2). Targets were pictures of familiar or unfamiliar locations. Although, overall, familiar targets were seen better than unfamiliar targets in both studies, stimulus familiarity did not reduce the relative perceptual impairments caused by emotional distractors.",
keywords = "Attentional blink, emotion-induced blindness, familiarity",
author = "Daniel Guilbert and Most, {Steven B.} and Kim Curby",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/02699931.2019.1637333",
language = "English",
journal = "Cognition and Emotion",
issn = "0269-9931",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",

}

Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception : Evidence from two temporal attention tasks. / Guilbert, Daniel; Most, Steven B.; Curby, Kim.

In: Cognition and Emotion, 08.07.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Real world familiarity does not reduce susceptibility to emotional disruption of perception

T2 - Cognition and Emotion

AU - Guilbert,Daniel

AU - Most,Steven B.

AU - Curby,Kim

PY - 2019/7/8

Y1 - 2019/7/8

N2 - The visual system has been found to prioritise emotional stimuli so robustly that their presence can temporarily “blind” people to non-emotional targets in their direct line of vision. This has ostensible implications for the real world: medics must not be blinded to important information despite the trauma they confront, and drivers must not be blinded when passing emotionally engaging billboards. One possibility is that the familiarity of goal-relevant information can protect people’s perception of it despite emotional distraction (e.g. drivers’ perception might be less impaired by graphic ads when on a familiar road). In two experiments, we tested whether familiarity renders targets more perceptible following the presentation of an emotional distractor in two temporal attention tasks, emotion-induced blindness (Experiment 1) and the attentional blink (Experiment 2). Targets were pictures of familiar or unfamiliar locations. Although, overall, familiar targets were seen better than unfamiliar targets in both studies, stimulus familiarity did not reduce the relative perceptual impairments caused by emotional distractors.

AB - The visual system has been found to prioritise emotional stimuli so robustly that their presence can temporarily “blind” people to non-emotional targets in their direct line of vision. This has ostensible implications for the real world: medics must not be blinded to important information despite the trauma they confront, and drivers must not be blinded when passing emotionally engaging billboards. One possibility is that the familiarity of goal-relevant information can protect people’s perception of it despite emotional distraction (e.g. drivers’ perception might be less impaired by graphic ads when on a familiar road). In two experiments, we tested whether familiarity renders targets more perceptible following the presentation of an emotional distractor in two temporal attention tasks, emotion-induced blindness (Experiment 1) and the attentional blink (Experiment 2). Targets were pictures of familiar or unfamiliar locations. Although, overall, familiar targets were seen better than unfamiliar targets in both studies, stimulus familiarity did not reduce the relative perceptual impairments caused by emotional distractors.

KW - Attentional blink

KW - emotion-induced blindness

KW - familiarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068661819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/02699931.2019.1637333

DO - 10.1080/02699931.2019.1637333

M3 - Article

JO - Cognition and Emotion

JF - Cognition and Emotion

SN - 0269-9931

ER -