Reasons reflection and repugnance

Doug McConnell, Jeanette Kennett

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Moral conservative Leon Kass claims that repugnance is the emotional expression of deep wisdom, so intuitions generated by repugnance should guide our adoption of enhancement technologies. Contra Kass, the authors argue that plausible accounts of rational and wise action integrate intuition and reflection. The wise only rely on intuitions over reflective thought when those intuitions have been developed through reflection, training, and experience and are subject to reflective oversight. Therefore the normative authority of intuitions is parasitic on long-term reflective training. More central to wisdom are the policies of epistemic humility, open-mindedness and a willingness to justify one’s actions. These policies allow the wise agent to train both their affective responses and their reflective thinking to track their reasons more robustly. Repugnance may alert us to the need for caution but it does not have the normative authority to end the conversation.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe ethics of human enhancement
Subtitle of host publicationunderstanding the debate
EditorsSteve Clarke, Julian Savulescu, C.A.J. Coady, Alberto Giubilini, Sagar Sanyal
Place of PublicationOxford
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages58-74
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9780198754855
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Intuition
Reflective
Authority
Wisdom
Willingness
Thought
Humility
Emotional Expression
Enhancement
Affective Response
Train

Keywords

  • repugnance
  • enhancement
  • moral conservative
  • wisdom
  • intuition
  • reflection
  • epistemic humility
  • justification

Cite this

McConnell, D., & Kennett, J. (2016). Reasons reflection and repugnance. In S. Clarke, J. Savulescu, C. A. J. Coady, A. Giubilini, & S. Sanyal (Eds.), The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate (pp. 58-74). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0004
McConnell, Doug ; Kennett, Jeanette. / Reasons reflection and repugnance. The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate. editor / Steve Clarke ; Julian Savulescu ; C.A.J. Coady ; Alberto Giubilini ; Sagar Sanyal. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2016. pp. 58-74
@inbook{2178e4ac18e9454593ee23bc54fbb67f,
title = "Reasons reflection and repugnance",
abstract = "Moral conservative Leon Kass claims that repugnance is the emotional expression of deep wisdom, so intuitions generated by repugnance should guide our adoption of enhancement technologies. Contra Kass, the authors argue that plausible accounts of rational and wise action integrate intuition and reflection. The wise only rely on intuitions over reflective thought when those intuitions have been developed through reflection, training, and experience and are subject to reflective oversight. Therefore the normative authority of intuitions is parasitic on long-term reflective training. More central to wisdom are the policies of epistemic humility, open-mindedness and a willingness to justify one’s actions. These policies allow the wise agent to train both their affective responses and their reflective thinking to track their reasons more robustly. Repugnance may alert us to the need for caution but it does not have the normative authority to end the conversation.",
keywords = "repugnance, enhancement, moral conservative, wisdom, intuition, reflection, epistemic humility, justification",
author = "Doug McConnell and Jeanette Kennett",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0004",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780198754855",
pages = "58--74",
editor = "Clarke, {Steve } and Savulescu, {Julian } and Coady, {C.A.J. } and Giubilini, {Alberto } and Sanyal, {Sagar }",
booktitle = "The ethics of human enhancement",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

McConnell, D & Kennett, J 2016, Reasons reflection and repugnance. in S Clarke, J Savulescu, CAJ Coady, A Giubilini & S Sanyal (eds), The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0004

Reasons reflection and repugnance. / McConnell, Doug; Kennett, Jeanette.

The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate. ed. / Steve Clarke; Julian Savulescu; C.A.J. Coady; Alberto Giubilini; Sagar Sanyal. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2016. p. 58-74.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Reasons reflection and repugnance

AU - McConnell, Doug

AU - Kennett, Jeanette

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Moral conservative Leon Kass claims that repugnance is the emotional expression of deep wisdom, so intuitions generated by repugnance should guide our adoption of enhancement technologies. Contra Kass, the authors argue that plausible accounts of rational and wise action integrate intuition and reflection. The wise only rely on intuitions over reflective thought when those intuitions have been developed through reflection, training, and experience and are subject to reflective oversight. Therefore the normative authority of intuitions is parasitic on long-term reflective training. More central to wisdom are the policies of epistemic humility, open-mindedness and a willingness to justify one’s actions. These policies allow the wise agent to train both their affective responses and their reflective thinking to track their reasons more robustly. Repugnance may alert us to the need for caution but it does not have the normative authority to end the conversation.

AB - Moral conservative Leon Kass claims that repugnance is the emotional expression of deep wisdom, so intuitions generated by repugnance should guide our adoption of enhancement technologies. Contra Kass, the authors argue that plausible accounts of rational and wise action integrate intuition and reflection. The wise only rely on intuitions over reflective thought when those intuitions have been developed through reflection, training, and experience and are subject to reflective oversight. Therefore the normative authority of intuitions is parasitic on long-term reflective training. More central to wisdom are the policies of epistemic humility, open-mindedness and a willingness to justify one’s actions. These policies allow the wise agent to train both their affective responses and their reflective thinking to track their reasons more robustly. Repugnance may alert us to the need for caution but it does not have the normative authority to end the conversation.

KW - repugnance

KW - enhancement

KW - moral conservative

KW - wisdom

KW - intuition

KW - reflection

KW - epistemic humility

KW - justification

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0004

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0004

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780198754855

SP - 58

EP - 74

BT - The ethics of human enhancement

A2 - Clarke, Steve

A2 - Savulescu, Julian

A2 - Coady, C.A.J.

A2 - Giubilini, Alberto

A2 - Sanyal, Sagar

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

McConnell D, Kennett J. Reasons reflection and repugnance. In Clarke S, Savulescu J, Coady CAJ, Giubilini A, Sanyal S, editors, The ethics of human enhancement: understanding the debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2016. p. 58-74 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754855.003.0004