(Re)asserting indigenous rights and jurisdictions within a politics of place: Transformative nature of native title negotiations in South Australia

Parry Agius, Tom Jenkin, Sandy Jarvis, Richie Howitt, Rhiân Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Australia's dominant politics of place has largely failed to give meaningful recognition to Indigenous peoples. The Native Title Act 1993 required governments, industry and others to (re)consider the basis and extent of their authority, unsettling the non-Indigenous systems' assumed dominance. While Indigenous hopes about Native title have diminished as a result of subsequent judicial, legislative and administrative responses, Native title negotiations have been pivotal in redefining politics of place and Indigenous-settler relationships in Australia at several scales. Focusing on South Australia's Statewide Indigenous Land Use Agreement Negotiation Strategy, this paper considers such a redefinition. The paper identifies four strategies as critical to success in transformative spatial politics: getting process right; recognising and supporting Indigenous jurisdictions; engaging and transforming non-Indigenous scales; and shifting Native title process away from legalities, towards people and relationships. Since 1999, these strategies have transformed the politics of place and built more equitable inter-cultural relationships and networks based on mutual recognition and respect between Indigenous and non-Indigenous rights and interests in land and waters.

LanguageEnglish
Pages194-202
Number of pages9
JournalGeographical Research
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
politics
legality
respect
land use
act
rights
industry
water

Cite this

@article{2a2679dbba4d47f58b1f9a2612d3ec22,
title = "(Re)asserting indigenous rights and jurisdictions within a politics of place: Transformative nature of native title negotiations in South Australia",
abstract = "Australia's dominant politics of place has largely failed to give meaningful recognition to Indigenous peoples. The Native Title Act 1993 required governments, industry and others to (re)consider the basis and extent of their authority, unsettling the non-Indigenous systems' assumed dominance. While Indigenous hopes about Native title have diminished as a result of subsequent judicial, legislative and administrative responses, Native title negotiations have been pivotal in redefining politics of place and Indigenous-settler relationships in Australia at several scales. Focusing on South Australia's Statewide Indigenous Land Use Agreement Negotiation Strategy, this paper considers such a redefinition. The paper identifies four strategies as critical to success in transformative spatial politics: getting process right; recognising and supporting Indigenous jurisdictions; engaging and transforming non-Indigenous scales; and shifting Native title process away from legalities, towards people and relationships. Since 1999, these strategies have transformed the politics of place and built more equitable inter-cultural relationships and networks based on mutual recognition and respect between Indigenous and non-Indigenous rights and interests in land and waters.",
author = "Parry Agius and Tom Jenkin and Sandy Jarvis and Richie Howitt and Rhi{\^a}n Williams",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00451.x",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "194--202",
journal = "Geographical Research",
issn = "1745-5863",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

(Re)asserting indigenous rights and jurisdictions within a politics of place : Transformative nature of native title negotiations in South Australia. / Agius, Parry; Jenkin, Tom; Jarvis, Sandy; Howitt, Richie; Williams, Rhiân.

In: Geographical Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 06.2007, p. 194-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Re)asserting indigenous rights and jurisdictions within a politics of place

T2 - Geographical Research

AU - Agius, Parry

AU - Jenkin, Tom

AU - Jarvis, Sandy

AU - Howitt, Richie

AU - Williams, Rhiân

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Australia's dominant politics of place has largely failed to give meaningful recognition to Indigenous peoples. The Native Title Act 1993 required governments, industry and others to (re)consider the basis and extent of their authority, unsettling the non-Indigenous systems' assumed dominance. While Indigenous hopes about Native title have diminished as a result of subsequent judicial, legislative and administrative responses, Native title negotiations have been pivotal in redefining politics of place and Indigenous-settler relationships in Australia at several scales. Focusing on South Australia's Statewide Indigenous Land Use Agreement Negotiation Strategy, this paper considers such a redefinition. The paper identifies four strategies as critical to success in transformative spatial politics: getting process right; recognising and supporting Indigenous jurisdictions; engaging and transforming non-Indigenous scales; and shifting Native title process away from legalities, towards people and relationships. Since 1999, these strategies have transformed the politics of place and built more equitable inter-cultural relationships and networks based on mutual recognition and respect between Indigenous and non-Indigenous rights and interests in land and waters.

AB - Australia's dominant politics of place has largely failed to give meaningful recognition to Indigenous peoples. The Native Title Act 1993 required governments, industry and others to (re)consider the basis and extent of their authority, unsettling the non-Indigenous systems' assumed dominance. While Indigenous hopes about Native title have diminished as a result of subsequent judicial, legislative and administrative responses, Native title negotiations have been pivotal in redefining politics of place and Indigenous-settler relationships in Australia at several scales. Focusing on South Australia's Statewide Indigenous Land Use Agreement Negotiation Strategy, this paper considers such a redefinition. The paper identifies four strategies as critical to success in transformative spatial politics: getting process right; recognising and supporting Indigenous jurisdictions; engaging and transforming non-Indigenous scales; and shifting Native title process away from legalities, towards people and relationships. Since 1999, these strategies have transformed the politics of place and built more equitable inter-cultural relationships and networks based on mutual recognition and respect between Indigenous and non-Indigenous rights and interests in land and waters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248636799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00451.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00451.x

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 194

EP - 202

JO - Geographical Research

JF - Geographical Research

SN - 1745-5863

IS - 2

ER -