Recent proposals to reform data protection laws in the EU and Australia: a comparative analysis

John Selby, Anneiles Moens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Data protection laws designed to balance the desire for individual privacy with business and government usage of personal information have spread around the world over the last few decades. After the first wave of regulation in the 1980s and 1990s, the continued growth of internet usage has highlighted shortcomings in those regulations. This has spurred a more recent wave of reform in data protection laws in many jurisdictions. This article gives an overview of recent data protection reform efforts in two federal regulatory systems, the European Union and Australia. It then explores the history of those reform efforts and compares several significant differences between these approaches.
LanguageEnglish
Pages65-70
Number of pages6
JournalComputer law review international
Volume14
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

data protection
EU
reform
Law
privacy
jurisdiction
Internet
regulation
history

Cite this

@article{96751952ac46425683327b1b7a663697,
title = "Recent proposals to reform data protection laws in the EU and Australia: a comparative analysis",
abstract = "Data protection laws designed to balance the desire for individual privacy with business and government usage of personal information have spread around the world over the last few decades. After the first wave of regulation in the 1980s and 1990s, the continued growth of internet usage has highlighted shortcomings in those regulations. This has spurred a more recent wave of reform in data protection laws in many jurisdictions. This article gives an overview of recent data protection reform efforts in two federal regulatory systems, the European Union and Australia. It then explores the history of those reform efforts and compares several significant differences between these approaches.",
author = "John Selby and Anneiles Moens",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "65--70",
journal = "Computer law review international",
issn = "1610-7608",
publisher = "Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt",
number = "3",

}

Recent proposals to reform data protection laws in the EU and Australia : a comparative analysis. / Selby, John; Moens, Anneiles.

In: Computer law review international, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2013, p. 65-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recent proposals to reform data protection laws in the EU and Australia

T2 - Computer law review international

AU - Selby,John

AU - Moens,Anneiles

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Data protection laws designed to balance the desire for individual privacy with business and government usage of personal information have spread around the world over the last few decades. After the first wave of regulation in the 1980s and 1990s, the continued growth of internet usage has highlighted shortcomings in those regulations. This has spurred a more recent wave of reform in data protection laws in many jurisdictions. This article gives an overview of recent data protection reform efforts in two federal regulatory systems, the European Union and Australia. It then explores the history of those reform efforts and compares several significant differences between these approaches.

AB - Data protection laws designed to balance the desire for individual privacy with business and government usage of personal information have spread around the world over the last few decades. After the first wave of regulation in the 1980s and 1990s, the continued growth of internet usage has highlighted shortcomings in those regulations. This has spurred a more recent wave of reform in data protection laws in many jurisdictions. This article gives an overview of recent data protection reform efforts in two federal regulatory systems, the European Union and Australia. It then explores the history of those reform efforts and compares several significant differences between these approaches.

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 65

EP - 70

JO - Computer law review international

JF - Computer law review international

SN - 1610-7608

IS - 3

ER -