TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations for mass spectrometry data quality metrics for open access data (corollary to the Amsterdam principles)
AU - Kinsinger, Christopher R.
AU - Apffel, James
AU - Baker, Mark
AU - Bian, Xiaopeng
AU - Borchers, Christoph H.
AU - Bradshaw, Ralph
AU - Brusniak, Mi Youn
AU - Chan, Daniel W.
AU - Deutsch, Eric W.
AU - Domon, Bruno
AU - Gorman, Jeff
AU - Grimm, Rudolf
AU - Hancock, William
AU - Hermjakob, Henning
AU - Horn, David
AU - Hunter, Christie
AU - Kolar, Patrik
AU - Kraus, Hans Joachim
AU - Langen, Hanno
AU - Linding, Rune
AU - Moritz, Robert L.
AU - Omenn, Gilbert S.
AU - Orlando, Ron
AU - Pandey, Akhilesh
AU - Ping, Peipei
AU - Rahbar, Amir
AU - Rivers, Robert
AU - Seymour, Sean L.
AU - Simpson, Richard J.
AU - Slotta, Douglas
AU - Smith, Richard D.
AU - Stein, Stephen E.
AU - Tabb, David L.
AU - Tagle, Danilo
AU - Yates, John R.
AU - Rodriguez, Henry
PY - 2012/1
Y1 - 2012/1
N2 - Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed upon two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (i) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (ii) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in Proteomics, Proteomics Clinical Applications, Journal of Proteome Research, and Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.
AB - Policies supporting the rapid and open sharing of proteomic data are being implemented by the leading journals in the field. The proteomics community is taking steps to ensure that data are made publicly accessible and are of high quality, a challenging task that requires the development and deployment of methods for measuring and documenting data quality metrics. On September 18, 2010, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) convened the "International Workshop on Proteomic Data Quality Metrics" in Sydney, Australia, to identify and address issues facing the development and use of such methods for open access proteomics data. The stakeholders at the workshop enumerated the key principles underlying a framework for data quality assessment in mass spectrometry data that will meet the needs of the research community, journals, funding agencies, and data repositories. Attendees discussed and agreed upon two primary needs for the wide use of quality metrics: (i) an evolving list of comprehensive quality metrics and (ii) standards accompanied by software analytics. Attendees stressed the importance of increased education and training programs to promote reliable protocols in proteomics. This workshop report explores the historic precedents, key discussions, and necessary next steps to enhance the quality of open access data. By agreement, this article is published simultaneously in Proteomics, Proteomics Clinical Applications, Journal of Proteome Research, and Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, as a public service to the research community. The peer review process was a coordinated effort conducted by a panel of referees selected by the journals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855461974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pmic.201100562
DO - 10.1002/pmic.201100562
M3 - Article
C2 - 22069307
AN - SCOPUS:84855461974
SN - 1615-9853
VL - 12
SP - 11
EP - 20
JO - Proteomics
JF - Proteomics
IS - 1
ER -