Recovery of precious metals using nickel sulfide fire assay collection: Problems at nanogram per gram concentrations

A. Frimpong, B. J. Fryer, H. P. Longerich*, Z. Chen, S. E. Jackson

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The NiS fire assay is widely used for the separation and concentration of PGE and Au from geological materials. The effect of collector mass on the recovery of PGE and Au in a Pt ore grade (μg g-1) sample and a komatiite sample which contained <10 ng g-1 of PGE are reported. The PGE and Au recoveries were not a function of collector mass for the ore grade sample. The recovery of Ir, Os and Au from the komatiite sample did not significantly depend on the mass of the collector used but Ru, Rh, Pd, and Pt recoveries were reproducible and dependent upon the collector mass. From these recoveries, estimates of the partition coefficients (Kd) were calculated for the sulfide and silicate melt phases. The Kd values were also estimated from direct analysis of the two phases. The recoveries of the precious metals were not always independent of the collector-to-flux-ratio. Also, the Kd values were found to depend upon the PGE concentrations. The Kd values obtained for an ore-grade sample were 4 to 103-fold higher than those obtained for a sample which contained < 10 ng g -1 PGE concentrations. Thus, when determining PGE concentrations at low levels using NiS fire assay collection, significant biases may occur.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1675-1680
    Number of pages6
    JournalThe Analyst
    Volume120
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1995

    Keywords

    • Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
    • Nickel sulfide fire assay
    • Partition coefficient
    • Platinum group element
    • Precious metal

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recovery of precious metals using nickel sulfide fire assay collection: Problems at nanogram per gram concentrations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this