Research output per year
Research output per year
Katsuaki Kojima, Chunyan Liu, Shelley Ehrlich, Harvey Dillon, Chelsea Blankenship, Lina Motlagh Zadeh, Jennifer Vannest, Lisa Hunter, Srikantan Nagarajan, David R. Moore
Research output: Working paper › Preprint
OBJECTIVE: To investigate neural mechanisms underlying speech in speech listening in adolescents with listening difficulties (LiD).
METHODS: Neural speech tracking (NST) was assessed using magnetoencephalography (MEG) in 21 adolescents with LiD and 25 typically developing (TD) peers, all with audiometrically normal hearing. Participants performed a cocktail party task involving target speech presented alone or alongside competitor speech streams differing in talker identity and spatial location. NST was quantified using theta-band (4 to 8 Hz) inter-event phase coherence (IEPC) to acoustic edges.
RESULTS: Adolescents with LiD demonstrated significantly reduced NST of target speech relative to TD peers, whereas NST of competitor speech was comparable between groups. Theta-band IEPC correlated with caregiver-reported listening difficulties in both groups, indicating clinical relevance. The presence of both talker and spatial cues synergistically enhanced NST of target speech, an effect more pronounced in TD adolescents and absent for competitor streams.
CONCLUSIONS: LiD is characterized by impairment in processing attended speech rather than enhanced competitor processing or generalized auditory disengagement. Reduced cue integration observed in adolescents with LiD may contribute to their listening challenges.
SIGNIFICANCE: These findings suggest targeted therapeutic interventions enhancing selective auditory attention and multimodal cue integration may effectively address listening difficulties in adolescents with LiD.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 48 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Submitted - 24 Jun 2025 |
| Name | medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences |
|---|
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review