Reduced verification of medication alerts increases prescribing errors

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Clinicians using clinical decision support (CDS) to prescribe medications have an obligation to ensure that prescriptions are safe. One option is to verify the safety of prescriptions if there is uncertainty, for example, by using drug references. Supervisory control experiments in aviation and process control have associated errors, with reduced verification arising from overreliance on decision support. However, it is unknown whether this relationship extends to clinical decision-making. Therefore, we examine whether there is a relationship between verification behaviors and prescribing errors, with and without CDS medication alerts, and whether task complexity mediates this.

Methods: A total of 120 students in the final 2 years of a medical degree prescribed medicines for patient scenarios using a simulated electronic prescribing system. CDS (correct, incorrect, and no CDS) and task complexity (low and high) were varied. Outcomes were omission (missed prescribing errors) and commission errors (accepted false-positive alerts). Verification measures were access of drug references and view time percentage of task time.

Results: Failure to access references for medicines with prescribing errors increased omission errors with no CDS (high-complexity: χ2(1) = 12.716; p < 0.001) and incorrect CDS (Fisher's exact; low-complexity: p = 0.002; high-complexity: p = 0.001). Failure to access references for false-positive alerts increased commission errors (low-complexity: χ2(1) = 16.673, p < 0.001; high-complexity: χ2(1) = 18.690, p < 0.001). Fewer participants accessed relevant references with incorrect CDS compared with no CDS (McNemar; low-complexity: p < 0.001; high-complexity: p < 0.001). Lower view time percentages increased omission (F(3, 361.914) = 4.498; p = 0.035) and commission errors (F(1, 346.223) = 2.712; p = 0.045). View time percentages were lower in CDS-assisted conditions compared with unassisted conditions (F(2, 335.743) = 10.443; p < 0.001).

Discussion: The presence of CDS reduced verification of prescription safety. When CDS was incorrect, reduced verification was associated with increased prescribing errors.

Conclusion: CDS can be incorrect, and verification provides one mechanism to detect errors. System designers need to facilitate verification without increasing workload or eliminating the benefits of correct CDS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)66-76
Number of pages11
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2019

Keywords

  • automation bias
  • clinical decision support systems
  • cognitive load
  • human-computer interaction
  • medication alerts
  • medication errors

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reduced verification of medication alerts increases prescribing errors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this