Abstract
Urban rail transport megaprojects are promoted as generating positive social change at a metropolitan scale, yet they produce complex unplanned negative impacts at local scales. Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and its follow-up help decision-makers assess and manage the social and environmental impacts of major projects. Using Western Sydney’s politically-successful South West Rail Link as an example, we identified the practice challenges and governance barriers to applying ESIA and EIA follow-up across spatial scales. These challenges and barriers influence the planning and management of the impacts of integrated urban development and transport infrastructure development.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 185-198 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Urban Policy and Research |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 23 Feb 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jul 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2020. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- EIA follow-up
- Social impact assessment
- environmental impact assessment
- integrated planning
- transport infrastructure planning
- urban planning
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reflecting on how social impacts are considered in transport infrastructure project planning: looking beyond the claimed success of Sydney's South West Rail Link'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver