Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reflecting on messy practice: action research on peer review of teaching

Agnes Bosanquet, Rod Lane

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    In this chapter, we offer a glimpse behind the scenes of higher education scholarship in action. We reflect on the unanticipated complexities of a participatory action research project on the peer review of teaching in a university context. Our aim was to promote a culture of ongoing reflection that would lead to quality enhancements in learning, teaching, and curriculum practices. Instead, this was one of the most fraught teaching development and research projects in which we been involved, in over thirty years combined working, researching, and teaching in higher education. Documenting our reflective practice offers a way of working through the complex and messy ethical, theoretical, practical, and affective challenges of this research and teaching development project. We share our learning about the risks and complexities of ‘insider research’ or researching within our own institution. This chapter has provided an opportunity to reflect on our assumptions, values, integrity, and ethical positioning–in other words, to explore questions of researcher reflexivity.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationCritical reflection on research in teaching and learning
    EditorsNancy E. Fenton, Whitney Ross
    Place of PublicationLeiden ; Boston
    PublisherBrill
    Pages173-191
    Number of pages19
    ISBN (Electronic)9789004436657
    ISBN (Print)9789004436640, 9789004436633
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Publication series

    NameCritical Issues in the Future of Learning and Teaching
    PublisherBrill
    Volume19
    ISSN (Electronic)2542-8721

    Keywords

    • peer review of teaching
    • participatory action research
    • reflection
    • researcher reflexivity

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Reflecting on messy practice: action research on peer review of teaching'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this