Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Reframing commitment in authentic leadership: Untangling relationship-outcome processes

Andrei A. Lux*, Steven L. Grover, Stephen T.T. Teo

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Affective organizational commitment is theorized and empirically tested as a key mediator between authentic leadership and desirable employee outcomes. The results of a two-wave survey of 830 business people in Australia support a serial mediation model of authentic leadership efficacy. Followers' perceptions of authentic leadership behavior influence their personal identification and affect-based trust in the leader, which in turn are mediated by affective organizational commitment to positively influence their work engagement and job satisfaction. These findings reinforce previous work that positions personal identification and affect-based trust as the two primary mediating mechanisms of authentic leadership. This paper extends prior research by demonstrating the important role of followers' affective bonds with their organization in the operation of authentic leadership, moving beyond the dyad in our understanding of follower outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103 - 121
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Management and Organization
Volume29
Issue number1
Early online date6 Dec 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

Bibliographical note

© Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2019. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Authentic leadership
  • job satisfaction
  • organizational commitment
  • personal identification
  • trust
  • work engagement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reframing commitment in authentic leadership: Untangling relationship-outcome processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this