Refusing defeatism: Derrida, decision and absolute risk

Nick Mansfield*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper attempts to show how Derrida's thinking on contemporary politics insists on several key themes indispensable to a renewal of democracy. These themes are, firstly, the issue of competence. Technical calculation in the military sphere-what Virilio calls logistics-aims to reduce the subjectivity and responsibility of human decision to zero. This denial of the problem of human competence removes decision-making from the democratic sphere by attempting to automatise it. Secondly, Derrida insists that politics requires decision-making that is accountable to the Other, that acknowledges its own impossibility, and that is thus subject to absolute risk. In an era when the population feels increasingly disenfranchised and political decision is consistently presented as inevitable and necessary calculation, these insights re-introduce into politics an insistence on difficulty, discourse, danger and responsibility.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)473-483
    Number of pages11
    JournalSocial Semiotics
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2006

    Keywords

    • Decision
    • Derrida
    • Negotiation
    • Politics
    • Post-structuralism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Refusing defeatism: Derrida, decision and absolute risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this