Regulating casual employment in Australia

Raymond Markey, Joseph McIvor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The rise of precarious and non-standard working arrangements has received substantial attention in recent times. In Australia precarious work has been particularly associated with the phenomenon of casual work, defined as employment without the leave benefits provided by the National Employment Standards. Casual employment status is at the employers' discretion. It may be long term and involve short shifts of less than 4 hours. In the recent Modern Awards Review by the Australian Fair Work Commission, the Australian Council of Trade Unions submitted proposals to limit employers' ability to unilaterally determine the employment relationship and to reduce the degree of precariousness associated with casual employment. The Australian Council of Trade Unions sought the right for long-term casuals to convert to permanent employment and to extend minimum hours for shifts. This article surveys the evidence, primary and secondary, regarding the extent and nature of Australian casual employment, including its impact on flexibility, earnings security and productivity. In this context, we explore the implications of the Australian Council of Trade Unions claims and Fair Work Commission decision, and present data from a survey of casual employees regarding employment preferences. Whilst some employees prefer casual status, we find that many would benefit from protective regulations, and that most casuals support such regulation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages593-618
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Industrial Relations
Volume60
Issue number5
Early online date5 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Trade unions
Employers
Employees
Employment status
Discretion
Productivity

Keywords

  • Casual work
  • Fair Work Commission
  • Modern Awards Review
  • precarious work
  • underemployment

Cite this

Markey, Raymond ; McIvor, Joseph. / Regulating casual employment in Australia. In: Journal of Industrial Relations. 2018 ; Vol. 60, No. 5. pp. 593-618.
@article{6a60dfd8fdc941b58e5d39036ecbb6ed,
title = "Regulating casual employment in Australia",
abstract = "The rise of precarious and non-standard working arrangements has received substantial attention in recent times. In Australia precarious work has been particularly associated with the phenomenon of casual work, defined as employment without the leave benefits provided by the National Employment Standards. Casual employment status is at the employers' discretion. It may be long term and involve short shifts of less than 4 hours. In the recent Modern Awards Review by the Australian Fair Work Commission, the Australian Council of Trade Unions submitted proposals to limit employers' ability to unilaterally determine the employment relationship and to reduce the degree of precariousness associated with casual employment. The Australian Council of Trade Unions sought the right for long-term casuals to convert to permanent employment and to extend minimum hours for shifts. This article surveys the evidence, primary and secondary, regarding the extent and nature of Australian casual employment, including its impact on flexibility, earnings security and productivity. In this context, we explore the implications of the Australian Council of Trade Unions claims and Fair Work Commission decision, and present data from a survey of casual employees regarding employment preferences. Whilst some employees prefer casual status, we find that many would benefit from protective regulations, and that most casuals support such regulation.",
keywords = "Casual work, Fair Work Commission, Modern Awards Review, precarious work, underemployment",
author = "Raymond Markey and Joseph McIvor",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022185618778084",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "593--618",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0022-1856",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",
number = "5",

}

Regulating casual employment in Australia. / Markey, Raymond; McIvor, Joseph.

In: Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 60, No. 5, 01.11.2018, p. 593-618.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating casual employment in Australia

AU - Markey, Raymond

AU - McIvor, Joseph

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The rise of precarious and non-standard working arrangements has received substantial attention in recent times. In Australia precarious work has been particularly associated with the phenomenon of casual work, defined as employment without the leave benefits provided by the National Employment Standards. Casual employment status is at the employers' discretion. It may be long term and involve short shifts of less than 4 hours. In the recent Modern Awards Review by the Australian Fair Work Commission, the Australian Council of Trade Unions submitted proposals to limit employers' ability to unilaterally determine the employment relationship and to reduce the degree of precariousness associated with casual employment. The Australian Council of Trade Unions sought the right for long-term casuals to convert to permanent employment and to extend minimum hours for shifts. This article surveys the evidence, primary and secondary, regarding the extent and nature of Australian casual employment, including its impact on flexibility, earnings security and productivity. In this context, we explore the implications of the Australian Council of Trade Unions claims and Fair Work Commission decision, and present data from a survey of casual employees regarding employment preferences. Whilst some employees prefer casual status, we find that many would benefit from protective regulations, and that most casuals support such regulation.

AB - The rise of precarious and non-standard working arrangements has received substantial attention in recent times. In Australia precarious work has been particularly associated with the phenomenon of casual work, defined as employment without the leave benefits provided by the National Employment Standards. Casual employment status is at the employers' discretion. It may be long term and involve short shifts of less than 4 hours. In the recent Modern Awards Review by the Australian Fair Work Commission, the Australian Council of Trade Unions submitted proposals to limit employers' ability to unilaterally determine the employment relationship and to reduce the degree of precariousness associated with casual employment. The Australian Council of Trade Unions sought the right for long-term casuals to convert to permanent employment and to extend minimum hours for shifts. This article surveys the evidence, primary and secondary, regarding the extent and nature of Australian casual employment, including its impact on flexibility, earnings security and productivity. In this context, we explore the implications of the Australian Council of Trade Unions claims and Fair Work Commission decision, and present data from a survey of casual employees regarding employment preferences. Whilst some employees prefer casual status, we find that many would benefit from protective regulations, and that most casuals support such regulation.

KW - Casual work

KW - Fair Work Commission

KW - Modern Awards Review

KW - precarious work

KW - underemployment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048133848&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022185618778084

DO - 10.1177/0022185618778084

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 593

EP - 618

JO - Journal of Industrial Relations

T2 - Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0022-1856

IS - 5

ER -