Regulation fair disclosure and the cost of adverse selection

Baljit Sidhu*, Tom Smith, Robert E. Whaley, Richard H. Willis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)


Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD), imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission in October 2000, was designed to prohibit disclosure of material private information to selected market participants. The informational advantage such select participants gain is unclear. If multiple "insiders" receive identical information, private information is immediately incorporated in price and each insider has zero expected profit. If, on the other hand, Regulation FD has curtailed the flow of information from firms, private information becomes longer-lived and more valuable. Hence, market makers will demand increased compensation by widening the adverse selection component of the bid-ask spread. We identify the cost components of the bid-ask spread for a sample of NASDAQ stocks surrounding the implementation of Regulation FD. Controlling for other factors affecting the spread, we find that adverse selection costs increase approximately 36% after Regulation FD. We interpret our finding as Regulation FD failing to achieve one of its desired objectives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)697-728
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Accounting Research
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Regulation fair disclosure and the cost of adverse selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this