Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity

Walter R. Frontera; Marcus J. Fuhrer; Alan M. Jette; Leighton Chan; Rory A. Cooper; Pamela W. Duncan; John D. Kemp; Kenneth J. Ottenbacher; P. Hunter Peckham; Elliot J. Roth; Denise G. Tate

doi:10.1097/00001199-200601000-00001

Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity

Walter R. Frontera^*, Marcus J. Fuhrer, Alan M. Jette, Leighton Chan, Rory A. Cooper, Pamela W. Duncan, John D. Kemp, Kenneth J. Ottenbacher, P. Hunter Peckham, Elliot J. Roth, Denise G. Tate

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this article.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-7
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
Volume	21
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/00001199-200601000-00001
Publication status	Published - Jan 2006
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Coalition
Physical medicine and rehabilitation
Rehabilitation science
Researech capacity

Access to Document

10.1097/00001199-200601000-00001

Cite this

@article{260edd531b74486c96235753a2eec427,

title = "Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity",

abstract = "The general objective of the {"}Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity{"} was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this article. ",

keywords = "Coalition, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Rehabilitation science, Researech capacity",

author = "Frontera, {Walter R.} and Fuhrer, {Marcus J.} and Jette, {Alan M.} and Leighton Chan and Cooper, {Rory A.} and Duncan, {Pamela W.} and Kemp, {John D.} and Ottenbacher, {Kenneth J.} and Peckham, {P. Hunter} and Roth, {Elliot J.} and Tate, {Denise G.}",

year = "2006",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1097/00001199-200601000-00001",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "1--7",

journal = "Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation",

issn = "0885-9701",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rehabilitation medicine summit

T2 - Building research capacity

AU - Frontera, Walter R.

AU - Fuhrer, Marcus J.

AU - Jette, Alan M.

AU - Chan, Leighton

AU - Cooper, Rory A.

AU - Duncan, Pamela W.

AU - Kemp, John D.

AU - Ottenbacher, Kenneth J.

AU - Peckham, P. Hunter

AU - Roth, Elliot J.

AU - Tate, Denise G.

PY - 2006/1

Y1 - 2006/1

N2 - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this article.

AB - The general objective of the "Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity" was to advance and promote research in medical rehabilitation by making recommendations to expand research capacity. The 5 elements of research capacity that guided the discussions were (1) researchers; (2) research culture, environment, and infrastructure; (3) funding; (4) partnerships; and (5) metrics. The 100 participants included representatives of professional organizations, consumer groups, academic departments, researchers, governmental funding agencies, and the private sector. The small group discussions and plenary sessions generated an array of problems, possible solutions, and recommended actions. A post-Summit, multiorganizational initiative is called to pursue the agendas outlined in this article.

KW - Coalition

KW - Physical medicine and rehabilitation

KW - Rehabilitation science

KW - Researech capacity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645651103&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00001199-200601000-00001

DO - 10.1097/00001199-200601000-00001

M3 - Article

C2 - 16456387

AN - SCOPUS:33645651103

SN - 0885-9701

VL - 21

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation

IS - 1

ER -

Rehabilitation medicine summit: Building research capacity

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this