Abstract
No single constraint can explain the stagnant agricultural productivity growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Most interventions that relax individual barriers to productivity have delivered disappointing results. We evaluate an at-scale program that targets several productivity constraints with a bundled intervention, using a randomized controlled trial in western Kenya. Program participation increases maize yields by 26%, total maize output by 24%, and profits by 18%. While we cannot directly test whether the program's success is due to its bundled nature, we find patterns in the data that are consistent with this hypothesis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 103409 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Journal of Development Economics |
Volume | 174 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2025 |
Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Agriculture
- Cost–benefit analysis
- Extension
- Productivity
- Randomized controlled trial
Press/Media
-
Why bundled agricultural programmes may succeed where others fail
Emilia Tjernstrom, Joshua W. Deutschmann, Maya Duru & Kim Siegal
29/04/25
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Research