Abstract
No single constraint can explain the stagnant agricultural productivity growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Most interventions that relax individual barriers to productivity have delivered disappointing results. We evaluate an at-scale program that targets several productivity constraints with a bundled intervention, using a randomized controlled trial in western Kenya. Program participation increases maize yields by 26%, total maize output by 24%, and profits by 18%. While we cannot directly test whether the program's success is due to its bundled nature, we find patterns in the data that are consistent with this hypothesis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 103409 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Development Economics |
| Volume | 174 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Bibliographical note
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- Agriculture
- Cost–benefit analysis
- Extension
- Productivity
- Randomized controlled trial
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Relaxing multiple agricultural productivity constraints at scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Why bundled agricultural programmes may succeed where others fail
Tjernstrom, E., Deutschmann, J. W., Duru, M. & Siegal, K.
29/04/25
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Research
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver