Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing

A systematic review

Niamh A. Moloney, Toby M. Hall, Catherine M. Doody

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of quantitative sensory testing (QST) has become more widespread, with increasing focus on describing somatosensory profiles and pain mechanisms. However, the reliability of thermal QST has yet to be established. We systematically searched the literature using key medical databases. Independent reviewers evaluated reliability data using the Quality Appraisal for Reliability Studies checklist. Of the 21 studies we included in this review, we deemed 5 to have high methodological quality. Narrative analysis revealed that estimates of reliability varied considerably, but overall, the reliability of cold and warm detection thresholds ranged from poor to excellent, while heat and cold pain thresholds ranged from fair to excellent. The methodological quality of research investigating the reliability of thermal QST warrants improvement, particularly in terms of appropriate blinding. The results from this review showed considerable variability in the reliability of each thermal QST parameter.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-208
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of rehabilitation research and development
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this