Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults

Niamh A. Moloney, Toby M. Hall, Tomas C. O'Sullivan, Catherine M. Doody

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing (QST) has yet to be fully established. In this study we investigated intra- and interrater reliability of thermal QST in a blinded manner. Methods: Two investigators recorded thermal detection and pain thresholds on the hand of 22 volunteers, twice on two occasions. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and coefficients of variation (CVs). Results: Mean intraindividual differences were small for all measures except cold pain thresholds. ICC values for intra- and interrater reliability were: cold detection, 0.27-0.55; warm detection, 0.33-0.69; and heat pain, 0.39-0.86. Cold pain yielded high ICC values (0.87-0.94), but also high CV (84.9-90.2%). Conclusions: In young, healthy adults, thermal detection and heat pain thresholds of the hand demonstrated good reliability for group comparisons and individual analyses. Cold pain threshold measures may be suitable for group comparisons, but a large variance in the data limits individual analyses.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-552
Number of pages6
JournalMuscle and Nerve
Volume44
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of thermal quantitative sensory testing of the hand in a cohort of young, healthy adults'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this