Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: content does not correlate with context sensitivity

Neil Levy*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Neil Van Leeuwen argues that religious beliefs are not factual beliefs: typically, at least, they are attitudes of a different type. He argues that they exhibit much more sensitivity to context than factual beliefs: outside of contexts in which they are salient, they do not govern behaviour or inference, or provide background assumptions for cognition. This article surveys a large range of data to show that the kind of context sensitivity that Van Leeuwen thinks is the province of religious beliefs does not correlate with belief content. Beliefs about matters of fact beyond the theological realm exhibit this kind of sensitivity too. Conversely, theological and supernatural beliefs often guide behaviour across contexts. It is the intuitiveness of representations across contexts that predicts context (in)sensitivity, and intuitiveness is powerfully influenced by processing fluency. Fluency, in turn, is sensitive to cues that vary across contexts.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)109-116
    Number of pages8
    JournalCognition
    Volume161
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2017

    Keywords

    • belief
    • cognitive science of religion
    • consistency
    • fluency

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: content does not correlate with context sensitivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this