Abstract
Introduction
The United Nations called member states to better support the education rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer and asexual (LGBTIQA +) people in recent years. However, Australian policy debates about schools’ ‘religious freedom’ and exemptions around gender and sexuality discrimination continue.
Methods
This article explores 1293 LGBTIQA + students’ experiences around religious freedom, gender, and sexuality by school type using data from the 2022 ‘Gender and Sexuality Expression in Schools’ survey. To understand correlations for students’ religious vs. non-religious educational institution types, basic descriptive and correlative statistical analyses were undertaken for quantitative data in SPSS and Excel including chi-square tests, alongside Leximancer-supported thematic analyses of qualitative responses.
Results
Attending religious schools was associated with (1) increased anti-LGBTIQA + and religious freedom-restricting policies, messages, and practices; (2) increased sexual orientation and gender identity and expression change efforts (SOGI- ECE) messages and practices; and (3) increased negative consequences and feelings. In religious education sites, professionals — especially teachers/educators — were more likely to spread anti-LGBTIQA + messaging at class/group and school-wide levels especially around ‘sinning’; however, professional codes appeared deterrents for school psychologists. In government schools, students more often unofficially spread anti-LGBTIQA + messaging around ‘brokenness’ or ‘social harmfulness’, mostly one-on-one.
Conclusions
The article shows the value of anti-discrimination laws and professional codes in reducing official problematic practices, for those contexts and professionals they applied to.
Policy Implications
Removal of exemptions for religious education institutions in anti-discrimination laws, revisions of education policies, and clearer protections for LGBTIQA + people in educators’ professional codes are recommended.
The United Nations called member states to better support the education rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex, queer and asexual (LGBTIQA +) people in recent years. However, Australian policy debates about schools’ ‘religious freedom’ and exemptions around gender and sexuality discrimination continue.
Methods
This article explores 1293 LGBTIQA + students’ experiences around religious freedom, gender, and sexuality by school type using data from the 2022 ‘Gender and Sexuality Expression in Schools’ survey. To understand correlations for students’ religious vs. non-religious educational institution types, basic descriptive and correlative statistical analyses were undertaken for quantitative data in SPSS and Excel including chi-square tests, alongside Leximancer-supported thematic analyses of qualitative responses.
Results
Attending religious schools was associated with (1) increased anti-LGBTIQA + and religious freedom-restricting policies, messages, and practices; (2) increased sexual orientation and gender identity and expression change efforts (SOGI- ECE) messages and practices; and (3) increased negative consequences and feelings. In religious education sites, professionals — especially teachers/educators — were more likely to spread anti-LGBTIQA + messaging at class/group and school-wide levels especially around ‘sinning’; however, professional codes appeared deterrents for school psychologists. In government schools, students more often unofficially spread anti-LGBTIQA + messaging around ‘brokenness’ or ‘social harmfulness’, mostly one-on-one.
Conclusions
The article shows the value of anti-discrimination laws and professional codes in reducing official problematic practices, for those contexts and professionals they applied to.
Policy Implications
Removal of exemptions for religious education institutions in anti-discrimination laws, revisions of education policies, and clearer protections for LGBTIQA + people in educators’ professional codes are recommended.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1133-1151 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Sexuality Research and Social Policy |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 14 Jan 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright the Author(s) 2023. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.Keywords
- school
- gender
- sexuality
- conversion
- LGBT
- policy
- practice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Religious freedom and LGBTIQA + students'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
2023 Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission (VEOHRC) & Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority (VCAA) – Strengthening human rights education in the Victorian context Roundtable Panel.
Jones, T. (Contributor)
7 Mar 2023Activity: End user engagement and expertise › Advisory position
-
Who spreads which SOGIECE messages to LGBTIQA+ Youth?’
Jones, T. (Speaker)
14 Feb 2023Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
-
2023 NSW Govt Stakeholder Roundtable & Consultation Paper – Banning LGBTQ+ Conversion Practices Education/Youth Roundtable Panel.
Jones, T. (Invited speaker)
16 Aug 2023Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk
Impacts
-
2023 NSW Parliament Hansard 58th Session 24.8.23 citation of conversion practices data
Jones, T. (Participant)
Impact: Policy impacts
-
2024 NSW Conversion Practices Prohibition Bill Adopted 22.3.24
Jones, T. (Participant)
Impact: Policy impacts
-
2025 Anti-Discrimination NSW Conversion Practices Ban Advisory Group
Jones, T. (Participant)
Impact: Policy impacts, Society impacts
Research output
- 8 Citations
- 1 Other report
-
No bad-faith exemptions: a submission to the NSW Government on banning LGBTQ+ conversion practices
Jones, T., Jones, T., Anderson, J., Despott, N., Csabs, C., Power, J. & Pallotta-Chiarolli, M., 25 Aug 2023, Melbourne: La Trobe University. 42 p.Research output: Book/Report › Other report
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver