Religious personal laws as non-state laws: implications for gender justice

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

Abstract

This article examines the concept of religious personal laws as used in Indian legal discourse. This concept is used to denote religious laws of various communities that are claimed to be upheld but not modified by the secular state and also to refer to the religion related rules followed by communities outside of state regulation. This existence of various 'religious' laws is increasingly being described as legal pluralism. The ambiguous status of religious personal laws serves to legitimize the continued denial by the state of gender equality to women in family law matters as it creates a space for rules or laws to operate that do not conform to the Constitutional requirements and yet are enforced by the state. When legal scholars deploy this concept un-reflexively they participate in the discourse formation about religious personal laws as exceptional laws or as (progressive) examples of legal pluralism. In this way they assist the state in using the concept as a mode of governance. In this article it is argued that the legal scholars need to accept responsibility for the significant power they wield as discourse formers and acknowledge the power of naming legal practices. They are the scholars who can and should deconstruct the concept of religious personal laws. This is necessary for a serious engagement with the issue of what kind of family law would be truly non-oppressive.

LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas
EditorsLivia Holden
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter2
Pages5-23
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)9781317607281
ISBN (Print)9781138812390
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

justice
Law
gender
family law
pluralism
discourse
legal usage
community
equality
Religion
governance
regulation
responsibility

Bibliographical note

Previously published in Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol, 45, Issue 1, pp. 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2013.773804

Cite this

Parashar, A. (2015). Religious personal laws as non-state laws: implications for gender justice. In L. Holden (Ed.), Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas (pp. 5-23). London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Parashar, Archana. / Religious personal laws as non-state laws : implications for gender justice. Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas. editor / Livia Holden. London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2015. pp. 5-23
@inbook{7f491b9467ce444bb07a6098238ff3ac,
title = "Religious personal laws as non-state laws: implications for gender justice",
abstract = "This article examines the concept of religious personal laws as used in Indian legal discourse. This concept is used to denote religious laws of various communities that are claimed to be upheld but not modified by the secular state and also to refer to the religion related rules followed by communities outside of state regulation. This existence of various 'religious' laws is increasingly being described as legal pluralism. The ambiguous status of religious personal laws serves to legitimize the continued denial by the state of gender equality to women in family law matters as it creates a space for rules or laws to operate that do not conform to the Constitutional requirements and yet are enforced by the state. When legal scholars deploy this concept un-reflexively they participate in the discourse formation about religious personal laws as exceptional laws or as (progressive) examples of legal pluralism. In this way they assist the state in using the concept as a mode of governance. In this article it is argued that the legal scholars need to accept responsibility for the significant power they wield as discourse formers and acknowledge the power of naming legal practices. They are the scholars who can and should deconstruct the concept of religious personal laws. This is necessary for a serious engagement with the issue of what kind of family law would be truly non-oppressive.",
author = "Archana Parashar",
note = "Previously published in Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol, 45, Issue 1, pp. 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2013.773804",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138812390",
pages = "5--23",
editor = "Livia Holden",
booktitle = "Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas",
publisher = "Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group",
address = "United Kingdom",

}

Parashar, A 2015, Religious personal laws as non-state laws: implications for gender justice. in L Holden (ed.), Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp. 5-23.

Religious personal laws as non-state laws : implications for gender justice. / Parashar, Archana.

Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas. ed. / Livia Holden. London : Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, 2015. p. 5-23.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

TY - CHAP

T1 - Religious personal laws as non-state laws

T2 - implications for gender justice

AU - Parashar, Archana

N1 - Previously published in Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Vol, 45, Issue 1, pp. 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2013.773804

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This article examines the concept of religious personal laws as used in Indian legal discourse. This concept is used to denote religious laws of various communities that are claimed to be upheld but not modified by the secular state and also to refer to the religion related rules followed by communities outside of state regulation. This existence of various 'religious' laws is increasingly being described as legal pluralism. The ambiguous status of religious personal laws serves to legitimize the continued denial by the state of gender equality to women in family law matters as it creates a space for rules or laws to operate that do not conform to the Constitutional requirements and yet are enforced by the state. When legal scholars deploy this concept un-reflexively they participate in the discourse formation about religious personal laws as exceptional laws or as (progressive) examples of legal pluralism. In this way they assist the state in using the concept as a mode of governance. In this article it is argued that the legal scholars need to accept responsibility for the significant power they wield as discourse formers and acknowledge the power of naming legal practices. They are the scholars who can and should deconstruct the concept of religious personal laws. This is necessary for a serious engagement with the issue of what kind of family law would be truly non-oppressive.

AB - This article examines the concept of religious personal laws as used in Indian legal discourse. This concept is used to denote religious laws of various communities that are claimed to be upheld but not modified by the secular state and also to refer to the religion related rules followed by communities outside of state regulation. This existence of various 'religious' laws is increasingly being described as legal pluralism. The ambiguous status of religious personal laws serves to legitimize the continued denial by the state of gender equality to women in family law matters as it creates a space for rules or laws to operate that do not conform to the Constitutional requirements and yet are enforced by the state. When legal scholars deploy this concept un-reflexively they participate in the discourse formation about religious personal laws as exceptional laws or as (progressive) examples of legal pluralism. In this way they assist the state in using the concept as a mode of governance. In this article it is argued that the legal scholars need to accept responsibility for the significant power they wield as discourse formers and acknowledge the power of naming legal practices. They are the scholars who can and should deconstruct the concept of religious personal laws. This is necessary for a serious engagement with the issue of what kind of family law would be truly non-oppressive.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979096287&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138812390

SP - 5

EP - 23

BT - Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas

A2 - Holden, Livia

PB - Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group

CY - London

ER -

Parashar A. Religious personal laws as non-state laws: implications for gender justice. In Holden L, editor, Legal pluralism and governance in South Asia and diasporas. London: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 2015. p. 5-23