Repetition blindness and effects of lexicality, similarity and task

V. Coltheart, L. Stephenson, R. Langdon

    Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

    Abstract

    Repetition blindness refers to the finding that report of both words from a sequence presented at rates of 8-10 per second is reduced if one of the words is a repetition of an earlier one. Reduced report also occurs even when the pair of words is merely similar orthographically or phonologically. We have found that if the items are pronounceable nonwords or pseudohomophones rather than words, repetition improves recall. This result was not obtained using a variant of the task. We report experiments which contrasted tasks, methods and types of items and varied lexicality and the relationship between the critical item pairs. The critical pair of items was repeated, similar or unrelated words, nonwords, homophones or pseudohomophones. The pattern of effects differs for different tasks and when the critical items are merely similar rather than identical. We consider the relationship between repetition and similarity effects and explanations of repetition blindness.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)69
    Number of pages1
    JournalAustralian Journal of Psychology
    Volume58
    Issue numberSuppl. 1
    Publication statusPublished - 2006
    Event33rd Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference - University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
    Duration: 20 Apr 200623 Apr 2006

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Repetition blindness and effects of lexicality, similarity and task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this