Abstract
Accuracy of report of words in a rapidly presented sequence is reduced if 1 word is a repetition of a previous word. This is repetition blindness. If, however, the items are pronounceable nonwords, or pseudohomophones, repetition improves recall. A repetition advantage for nonwords also occurs when subjects merely count the items or when the item between the critical nonwords is a familiar word. Familiarizing subjects with the nonwords improved the level of recall but did not affect the repetition advantage. These results are considered in relation to token individuation and other accounts of repetition blindness. The findings suggest that for identical linguistic stimuli the types bound to episodic memory tokens that are vulnerable to repetition blindness are lexical units.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 171-185 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Repetition Blindness for Words yet Repetition Advantage for Nonwords'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver