Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum

Shinichi Nakagawa; Timothy H. Parker

doi:10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3

Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum

Shinichi Nakagawa^*, Timothy H. Parker

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/opinion › peer-review

87 Citations (Scopus)

97 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We believe that replicating studies in ecology and evolution is extremely valuable, but replication within species and systems is troublingly rare, and even `quasi-replications' in different systems are often insufficient. We make a case for supporting multiple types of replications and point out that the current incentive structure needs to change if ecologists and evolutionary biologist are to value scientific replication sufficiently.

Original language	English
Article number	88
Pages (from-to)	1-6
Number of pages	6
Journal	BMC Biology
Volume	13
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3
Publication status	Published - 28 Oct 2015
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Access to Document

10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3Licence: CC BY

Publisher version (open access)Final published version, 379 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{a9e10e0b6b9b4bd88cd4e5192d873aeb,

title = "Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum",

abstract = "We believe that replicating studies in ecology and evolution is extremely valuable, but replication within species and systems is troublingly rare, and even `quasi-replications' in different systems are often insufficient. We make a case for supporting multiple types of replications and point out that the current incentive structure needs to change if ecologists and evolutionary biologist are to value scientific replication sufficiently.",

author = "Shinichi Nakagawa and Parker, {Timothy H.}",

note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",

year = "2015",

month = oct,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "1--6",

journal = "BMC Biology",

issn = "1741-7007",

publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Replicating research in ecology and evolution

T2 - feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum

AU - Nakagawa, Shinichi

AU - Parker, Timothy H.

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2015. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2015/10/28

Y1 - 2015/10/28

N2 - We believe that replicating studies in ecology and evolution is extremely valuable, but replication within species and systems is troublingly rare, and even `quasi-replications' in different systems are often insufficient. We make a case for supporting multiple types of replications and point out that the current incentive structure needs to change if ecologists and evolutionary biologist are to value scientific replication sufficiently.

AB - We believe that replicating studies in ecology and evolution is extremely valuable, but replication within species and systems is troublingly rare, and even `quasi-replications' in different systems are often insufficient. We make a case for supporting multiple types of replications and point out that the current incentive structure needs to change if ecologists and evolutionary biologist are to value scientific replication sufficiently.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946498815&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3

DO - 10.1186/s12915-015-0196-3

M3 - Comment/opinion

C2 - 26510635

SN - 1741-7007

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - BMC Biology

JF - BMC Biology

M1 - 88

ER -

Replicating research in ecology and evolution: feasibility, incentives, and the cost-benefit conundrum

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this